Department of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Kentucky.
The Heart and Soul of Change Project.
Psychol Serv. 2018 Nov;15(4):470-476. doi: 10.1037/ser0000163. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
High psychiatric readmission rates continue while evidence suggests that care is not perceived by patients as "patient centered." Research has focused on aftercare strategies with little attention to the inpatient treatment itself as an intervention to reduce readmission rates. Quality improvement strategies based on patient-centered care may offer an alternative. We evaluated outcomes and readmission rates using a benchmarking methodology with a naturalistic data set from an inpatient psychiatric facility (N = 2,247) that used a quality-improvement strategy called systematic patient feedback. Benchmarks were constructed using randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inpatient treatment for depression, RCTs from patient feedback in outpatient settings, and national data on psychiatric hospital readmission rates. A systematic patient feedback system, the Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS), was used. Overall pre-post effect sizes were d = 1.33 and d = 1.38 for patients diagnosed with a mood disorder. These effect sizes were statistically equivalent to RCT benchmarks for feedback and depression. Readmission rates were 6.1% (30 days), 9.5% (60 days), and 16.4% (180 days), all lower than national benchmarks. We also found that patients who achieved clinically significant treatment outcomes were less likely to be readmitted. We tentatively suggest that a focus on real-time patient outcomes as well as care that is "patient centered" may provide a path toward lower readmission rates in addition to other evidence-based strategies after discharge. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
高精神科再入院率持续存在,尽管有证据表明患者认为护理“以患者为中心”。研究主要集中在后续护理策略上,而很少关注住院治疗本身作为降低再入院率的干预措施。基于以患者为中心的护理的质量改进策略可能提供另一种选择。我们使用基准方法评估了来自住院精神病院的自然数据集(N = 2247)的结果和再入院率,该数据集使用了一种名为系统患者反馈的质量改进策略。基准是使用抑郁症住院治疗的随机临床试验(RCT)、门诊患者反馈的 RCT 和精神病院再入院率的国家数据构建的。使用了系统患者反馈系统,即合作伙伴改变结果管理系统(PCOMS)。总体前后效应大小为 d = 1.33 和 d = 1.38,患有情绪障碍的患者。这些效果大小与反馈和抑郁症的 RCT 基准具有统计学等效性。再入院率分别为 6.1%(30 天)、9.5%(60 天)和 16.4%(180 天),均低于国家基准。我们还发现,达到临床显著治疗效果的患者再入院的可能性较低。我们初步认为,关注实时患者结果以及“以患者为中心”的护理可能会降低再入院率,除了其他基于证据的出院后策略。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。