Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Center for Community Health Education Research and Service, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1094-1101. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0122. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
Despite efforts to ameliorate disparities in cancer care and clinical trials, barriers persist. As part of a multiphase community-engaged assessment, an exploratory community-engaged research partnership, forged between an academic hospital and a community-based organization, set out to explore perceptions of cancer care and cancer clinical trials by black Bostonians.
Key informant interviews with health care providers and patient advocates in community health centers (CHCs), organizers from grassroots coalitions focused on cancer, informed the development of a focus group protocol. Six focus groups were conducted with black residents in Boston, including groups of cancer survivors and family members. Transcripts were coded thematically and a code-based report was generated and analyzed by community and academic stakeholders.
While some participants identified clinical trials as beneficial, overall perceptions conjured feelings of fear and exploitation. Participants describe barriers to clinical trial participation in the context of cancer care experiences, which included negative interactions with providers and mistrust. Primary care physicians (PCPs) reported being levied as a trusted resource for patients undergoing care, but lamented the absence of a mechanism by which to gain information about cancer care and clinical trials.
Confusion about cancer care and clinical trials persists, even among individuals who have undergone treatment for cancer. Greater coordination between PCPs and CHC care teams and oncology care teams may improve patient experiences with cancer care, while also serving as a mechanism to disseminate information about treatment options and clinical trials.
Inequities in cancer care and clinical trial participation persist. The findings of this study indicate that greater coordination with primary care physicians (PCPs) and community health center (CHC) providers may be an important step for both improving the quality of cancer care in communities and increasing awareness of clinical trials. However, PCPs and CHCs are often stretched to capacity with caring for their communities. This leaves the oncology community well positioned to create programs to bridge the communication gaps and provide resources necessary to support oncologic care along the cancer continuum, from prevention through survivorship.
尽管为改善癌症护理和临床试验中的差异做出了努力,但仍存在障碍。作为多阶段社区参与评估的一部分,一个由学术医院和社区组织组成的探索性社区参与研究伙伴关系,旨在探索黑人波士顿人对癌症护理和癌症临床试验的看法。
在社区卫生中心(CHC)的医疗保健提供者和患者权益倡导者的关键知情人访谈中,来自专注于癌症的基层联盟的组织者,为焦点小组协议的制定提供了信息。在波士顿,对黑人居民进行了六次焦点小组讨论,其中包括癌症幸存者和家属的小组。对转录本进行了主题编码,并由社区和学术利益相关者生成和分析基于代码的报告。
尽管一些参与者认为临床试验有益,但总体看法却引起了恐惧和剥削的感觉。参与者描述了在癌症护理经历背景下参与临床试验的障碍,其中包括与提供者的负面互动和不信任。初级保健医生(PCP)报告说,他们是患者接受治疗时信任的资源,但遗憾的是,缺乏一种获取癌症护理和临床试验信息的机制。
即使是那些已经接受癌症治疗的人,对癌症护理和临床试验的困惑仍然存在。PCP 与 CHC 护理团队和肿瘤护理团队之间的协调加强,可能会改善患者的癌症护理体验,同时也是传播治疗选择和临床试验信息的一种机制。
癌症护理和临床试验参与方面的不平等仍然存在。这项研究的结果表明,与初级保健医生(PCP)和社区卫生中心(CHC)提供者加强协调,可能是提高社区癌症护理质量和提高临床试验意识的重要步骤。然而,PCP 和 CHC 经常因照顾他们的社区而不堪重负。这使得肿瘤学社区能够很好地开展项目,弥合沟通差距,并提供支持肿瘤学护理的必要资源,从预防到生存。