Suppr超能文献

一项关于非裔美国人、拉丁裔、亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民参与少数族裔研究的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。

A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.

机构信息

Sheba George is with the Center for Biomedical Informatics, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, and the Department of Community Health Sciences, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles. Nelida Duran is with the Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. Keith Norris is with the Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e16-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Abstract

To assess the experienced or perceived barriers and facilitators to health research participation for major US racial/ethnic minority populations, we conducted a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies from a search on PubMed and Web of Science from January 2000 to December 2011. With 44 articles included in the review, we found distinct and shared barriers and facilitators. Despite different expressions of mistrust, all groups represented in these studies were willing to participate for altruistic reasons embedded in cultural and community priorities. Greater comparative understanding of barriers and facilitators to racial/ethnic minorities' research participation can improve population-specific recruitment and retention strategies and could better inform future large-scale prospective quantitative and in-depth ethnographic studies.

摘要

为了评估美国主要种族/少数民族参与健康研究的经验或感知障碍和促进因素,我们对 2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月在 PubMed 和 Web of Science 上进行的定性和定量研究进行了系统评价。在综述中包括 44 篇文章,我们发现了不同的和共同的障碍和促进因素。尽管所有这些研究群体都表达了不同程度的不信任,但他们都愿意出于文化和社区优先事项中所包含的利他主义原因参与研究。对少数民族参与研究的障碍和促进因素有更深入的比较理解,可以改善针对特定人群的招募和保留策略,并为未来的大规模前瞻性定量和深入人种学研究提供更好的信息。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Ten simple rules for research with humans.关于人体研究的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Aug 7;21(8):e1013362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013362. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

3
Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.仅使用谷歌学术进行系统评价是不够的。
Online J Public Health Inform. 2013 Jul 1;5(2):214. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4623. Print 2013.
7
Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research.挑战关于少数族裔参与美国临床研究的假设。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2217-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验