Suppr超能文献

通用型与品牌型阿莫西林胶囊在健康人体志愿者中的生物等效性。

Bioequivalence of generic and branded amoxicillin capsules in healthy human volunteers.

作者信息

Pathak Priyanka, Pandit Vijaya A, Dhande Priti P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, BVDUMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pharmacol. 2017 Mar-Apr;49(2):176-181. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_793_16.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The Medical Council of India urges doctors to prescribe generic drugs as far as possible. The Indian Medical Association had responded earlier saying that it requires guarantees on the quality of generic forms of drugs. Although no published scientific reports are available on the issue of therapeutic inequivalence, unconfirmed clinician accounts and newspaper reports of therapeutic inequivalence exist.

AIM

This study was planned to ascertain whether bioequivalence of branded and generic amoxicillin capsule is comparable.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

An open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover oral bioequivalence study was conducted in 12 healthy, adult human subjects under fasting condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum samples, collected at 8 time points, were analyzed by a validated ultraviolet spectrophotometer method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters such as area under the curve (AUC), AUC, C, and T were determined along with time above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The log-transformed PK parameters (C, AUC, AUC) were analyzed using a Two One-Sided Test ANOVA in SAS for each parameter. T and MIC were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test in GraphPad Prism.

RESULTS

Geometric mean ratio of C fell within bioequivalence criteria. The upper and lower confidence limits of both AUC and AUC geometric mean ratio fell below bioequivalence criteria. Time above MIC of generic preparation was significantly lower than that of branded version.

CONCLUSIONS

The generic capsule was not bioequivalent to the branded amoxicillin capsule.

摘要

背景

印度医学委员会敦促医生尽可能开通用名药物。印度医学协会早些时候回应称,它需要通用名药物质量的保证。尽管关于治疗不等效性问题尚无已发表的科学报告,但存在未经证实的临床医生说法和报纸关于治疗不等效性的报道。

目的

本研究旨在确定品牌阿莫西林胶囊和通用名阿莫西林胶囊的生物等效性是否具有可比性。

设置与设计

在12名健康成年受试者空腹条件下,进行了一项开放标签、随机、单剂量、双治疗、双序列、双周期交叉口服生物等效性研究。

材料与方法

在8个时间点采集血清样本,采用经过验证的紫外分光光度法进行分析。测定药代动力学(PK)参数,如曲线下面积(AUC)、AUC、C和T,以及高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的时间。

所用统计分析方法

对每个参数,在SAS中使用双单侧检验方差分析对对数转换后的PK参数(C、AUC、AUC)进行分析。在GraphPad Prism中通过Wilcoxon秩和检验对T和MIC进行分析。

结果

C的几何平均比值符合生物等效性标准。AUC和AUC几何平均比值的上下置信限均低于生物等效性标准。通用名制剂高于MIC的时间显著低于品牌制剂。

结论

通用名胶囊与品牌阿莫西林胶囊不具有生物等效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b19/5497440/c1b025ef13cc/IJPharm-49-176-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验