Zhao Cathy Yunjia, Hwang Shelley Ji Eun, Wakade Deepal, Carlos Giuliana, Anforth Rachael, Fernández-Peñas Pablo
Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Australas J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;58(4):292-298. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12645. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Various cutaneous side-effects have been reported with anti-melanoma systemic therapies. This study investigated the changes in melanocytic lesion pigmentation in patients on four different therapies.
We analysed the serial dermatoscopic photographs of atypical melanocytic lesions taken from patients with advanced metastatic melanoma on four different systemic therapies (selective BRAF-inhibitor monotherapy, dabrafenib combined with trametinib [D&T], anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [anti-PD1] therapies, and anti-PD1 combined with ipilimumab) seen from February 2013 to May 2016. We compared these changes with the melanocytic lesions of 10 control patients.
In the control group, 19% of naevi lightened, 64% did not change and 17% darkened. Only the BRAF inhibitor group showed more darkened lesions than controls (37%, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were more lightened naevi in the D&T therapy group (86%, P < 0.001) as well as the anti-PD1 and ipilimumab groups (59%, P < 0.001) than controls. Patients on anti-PD1 monotherapy had more lightened (49%) and fewer darkened naevi (9%) than controls, but differences were not significant.
Our study showed that different anti-melanoma systemic therapies have different effects on the pigmentation of melanocytic lesions. BRAF inhibitor may have the propensity to cause darkening while D&T therapy and anti-PD1 caused lightening compared with controls. The findings emphasise the importance of regular dermatological monitoring in specialised clinics for patients on anti-melanoma systemic therapy. Clinicians should expect changes in the global pigmentation of melanocytic lesions but be suspicious of lesions with structural changes.
背景/目的:抗黑色素瘤全身治疗已报告有多种皮肤副作用。本研究调查了接受四种不同治疗的患者黑素细胞病变色素沉着的变化。
我们分析了2013年2月至2016年5月期间接受四种不同全身治疗(选择性BRAF抑制剂单药治疗、达拉非尼联合曲美替尼[D&T]、抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1[抗PD1]治疗以及抗PD1联合伊匹木单抗)的晚期转移性黑色素瘤患者非典型黑素细胞病变的系列皮肤镜照片。我们将这些变化与10名对照患者的黑素细胞病变进行了比较。
在对照组中,19%的痣变浅,64%无变化,17%变黑。只有BRAF抑制剂组显示变黑的病变比对照组更多(37%,P<0.001)。同时,D&T治疗组(86%,P<0.001)以及抗PD1和伊匹木单抗组(59%,P<0.001)变浅的痣比对照组更多。接受抗PD1单药治疗的患者变浅的痣更多(49%),变黑的痣更少(9%),但差异不显著。
我们的研究表明,不同的抗黑色素瘤全身治疗对黑素细胞病变的色素沉着有不同影响。与对照组相比,BRAF抑制剂可能有导致色素沉着加深的倾向,而D&T治疗和抗PD1则导致色素沉着变浅。这些发现强调了在专科诊所对接受抗黑色素瘤全身治疗的患者进行定期皮肤科监测的重要性。临床医生应预期黑素细胞病变整体色素沉着的变化,但对有结构变化的病变保持怀疑。