Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada .
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018 Feb;31(1):18-24. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2017.1398. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
To be considered bioequivalent to their branded counterparts, generic drugs must meet the standards for bioequivalence (BE) described by the regulatory agencies. While BE of generic inhalational drugs can be evaluated using a similar approach as that for oral dosage from products or drugs that are delivered systemically, the approach is insufficient to address the complexities of inhalational products (e.g., localized site of action, device-patient interface). Therefore, more considerations are needed and caution should be applied when evaluating BE of inhaled compounds. The purpose of this review is to highlight the considerations and challenges in establishing BE of inhaled compounds by (1) outlining the current regulatory approaches (from Health Canada, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the European Medicines Agency) to assess BE for subsequent entry inhaled products (SEIPs) and (2) reviewing the literature pertaining to testing considerations of SEIPs to establish BE.
为了被认为与品牌药物等效,仿制药必须符合监管机构描述的生物等效性 (BE) 标准。虽然可以使用类似于全身给药的口服剂型产品或药物的类似方法来评估仿制药的吸入制剂的 BE,但该方法不足以解决吸入制剂的复杂性(例如,作用部位局部化、器械-患者界面)。因此,在评估吸入化合物的 BE 时需要更多的考虑因素,并应谨慎应用。本文的目的是通过(1)概述当前的监管方法(来自加拿大卫生部、美国食品和药物管理局以及欧洲药品管理局)来评估后续吸入产品(SEIP)的 BE,以及(2)审查有关 SEIP 建立 BE 的测试考虑因素的文献,来强调建立吸入化合物 BE 时的注意事项和挑战。