Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Schulman IRB, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Aug;13(8):940-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
For nearly 50 years, institutional review boards (IRB) and independent ethics committees have featured local oversight as a core function of research ethics reviews. However growing complexity in Alzheimer's clinical research suggests current approaches to research volunteer safety is hampering development of new therapeutics. As a partial response to this challenge, the NIH has mandated that all NIH-funded multi-site studies will use a single Institutional Review Board. The perspective describes a joint program to provide a single IRB of record (sIRB) for phases of multi-site studies.
The approach follows two steps. One, an expert Scientific Review Committee (SRC) of senior researchers in the field will conduct the review principally of scientific merit, significance, feasibility, and the likelihood of meaningful results. The second step will be the IRB's regulatory and ethics review. The IRB will apply appropriate regulatory criteria for approval including minimization of risks to subjects and risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, equitable subject selection, informed consent, protections for vulnerable populations, and application of local context considerations, among others.
There is a steady demand for scientific, ethical and regulatory review of planned Alzheimer's studies. As of January 15, 2017, there are nearly 400 open studies, Phase II and III, industry and NIH sponsored trials on disease indications affecting memory, movement and mood in the US.
The effort will initially accept protocols for studies of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and related disorders effecting memory, movement and mood. Future aims will be to provide scientific review and, where applicable, regulatory and ethical review in an international context outside North America with sites possibly in Asia, Europe and Australia.
近 50 年来,机构审查委员会(IRB)和独立伦理委员会一直将地方监督作为研究伦理审查的核心功能。然而,阿尔茨海默病临床研究的日益复杂性表明,当前研究志愿者安全方法正在阻碍新疗法的开发。作为对此挑战的部分回应,NIH 已要求所有 NIH 资助的多地点研究将使用单一机构审查委员会。本文描述了一个联合计划,即为多地点研究的各个阶段提供一个单一的机构审查委员会(sIRB)。
该方法遵循两个步骤。首先,一个由该领域资深研究人员组成的专家科学审查委员会(SRC)将主要对科学价值、意义、可行性和可能产生有意义结果的可能性进行审查。第二步将是 IRB 的监管和伦理审查。IRB 将应用适当的监管标准进行批准,包括将受试者的风险和与预期收益合理相关的风险最小化、公平选择受试者、知情同意、保护弱势群体、以及应用当地情况考虑等。
对计划进行的阿尔茨海默病研究的科学、伦理和监管审查的需求稳定。截至 2017 年 1 月 15 日,美国有近 400 项开放研究、第二阶段和第三阶段的研究,以及针对影响记忆、运动和情绪的疾病的工业和 NIH 赞助试验。
该工作最初将接受影响记忆、运动和情绪的阿尔茨海默病、痴呆症和相关疾病的研究方案。未来的目标将是在北美以外的国际范围内提供科学审查,并且在亚洲、欧洲和澳大利亚等地的可能站点提供监管和伦理审查。