Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira - IMIP, Recife, Brazil; Clínica Multihemo/Oncoclínicas do Brasil, Recife, Brazil.
Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro State (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro -, Brazil.
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Cervical cancer is a global public health challenge. Since 1999, platin based chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard treatment for those patients with locally advanced disease. However, this population still has a dismal prognosis and, alternatives approaches such as adjuvant chemotherapy are controversial, especially because of increased toxicity. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could be an option for more intensive treatment with manageable toxicity.
A phase II, prospective, non-randomized trial was conducted at a reference center in Recife, Brazil. Locally advanced cervical cancer patients (Ib2-IVa) were treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin 35mg/m and gemcitabine 1000mg/m D1 and D8, for 2cycles. Then, they received CRT (50.4Gy) with weekly cisplatin 40mg/m followed by brachytherapy. Response rate (RR) and toxicity were the primary endpoints. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints.
Between Sep/2013 and Oct/2015, 50 patients were initiated on NACT and CRT. RR was 81% at the end of treatment. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity were most common. Grade 3/4 toxicity was 20% during NACT and 44% during CRT. Late adverse events were present in 20% of patients. PFS at 1 and 3-years were 73.4% (IC 58.7-83.6) and 53.9% (IC 36.9-68.3), respectively; and, OS at 1 and 3-years were 93.9% (IC 82.4-98.0) and 71.3% (IC 53.3-83.3), respectively.
In our hands NACT in locally advanced cervical cancer patients did not show a meaningful improvement in ORR. Nevertheless, we believe it should be further explored in prospective trials.
宫颈癌是全球公共卫生面临的一大挑战。自 1999 年以来,铂类为基础的放化疗(CRT)是局部晚期疾病患者的标准治疗方法。然而,这一人群的预后仍然很差,辅助化疗等替代方法存在争议,特别是因为毒性增加。新辅助化疗(NACT)可能是一种更具侵袭性且毒性可管理的治疗选择。
在巴西累西腓的一家参考中心进行了一项 II 期、前瞻性、非随机试验。局部晚期宫颈癌患者(Ib2-IVa)接受新辅助顺铂 35mg/m 和吉西他滨 1000mg/m D1 和 D8 治疗,共 2 个周期。然后,他们接受 CRT(50.4Gy),每周给予顺铂 40mg/m,随后进行近距离放疗。主要终点是缓解率(RR)和毒性。无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)是次要终点。
2013 年 9 月至 2015 年 10 月,50 例患者开始接受 NACT 和 CRT。治疗结束时 RR 为 81%。最常见的血液学和胃肠道毒性。NACT 期间有 20%的患者发生 3/4 级毒性,CRT 期间有 44%的患者发生 3/4 级毒性。20%的患者出现晚期不良事件。1 年和 3 年的 PFS 分别为 73.4%(IC 58.7-83.6)和 53.9%(IC 36.9-68.3);1 年和 3 年的 OS 分别为 93.9%(IC 82.4-98.0)和 71.3%(IC 53.3-83.3)。
在我们的研究中,局部晚期宫颈癌患者的 NACT 并未显示出缓解率有显著改善。然而,我们认为它应该在前瞻性试验中进一步探索。