Gutkowska Olga, Martynkiewicz Jacek, Gosk Jerzy
Department of Traumatology, Clinical Department of Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jul 15;23:3437-3445. doi: 10.12659/msm.901876.
Anterior glenohumeral dislocation affects about 2% of the general population during the lifetime. The incidence of traumatic glenohumeral dislocation ranges from 8.2 to 26.69 per 100 000 population per year. The most common complication is recurrent dislocation occurring in 17-96% of the patients. The majority of patients are treated conservatively by closed reduction and immobilization in internal rotation for 2-3 weeks. However, no clear conservative treatment protocol exists. Immobilization in external rotation can be considered an alternative. A range of external rotation braces are commercially available. The purpose of this work was to review the current literature on conservative management of glenohumeral dislocation and to compare the results of immobilization in internal and external rotation. A comprehensive literature search and review was performed using the keywords "glenohumeral dislocation", "shoulder dislocation", "immobilization", "external rotation", and "recurrent dislocation" in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases from their inceptions to May 2016. Three cadaveric studies, 6 imaging studies, 10 clinical studies, and 4 meta-analyses were identified. The total number of 734 patients were included in the clinical studies. Literature analysis revealed better coaptation of the labrum on the glenoid rim in external rotation in cadaveric and imaging studies. However, this tendency was not confirmed by lower redislocation rates or better quality of life in clinical studies. On the basis of the available literature, we cannot confirm the superiority of immobilization in external rotation after glenohumeral dislocation when compared to internal rotation. A yet-to-be-determined group of patients with specific labroligamentous injury pattern may benefit from immobilization in external rotation. Further studies are needed to identify these patients.
肩肱关节前脱位在一生中影响约2%的普通人群。创伤性肩肱关节脱位的发病率为每年每10万人中8.2至26.69例。最常见的并发症是复发性脱位,发生率为17%至96%。大多数患者通过闭合复位和内旋固定2至3周进行保守治疗。然而,目前尚无明确的保守治疗方案。外旋固定可作为一种替代方法。市场上有一系列外旋支具可供选择。本研究的目的是回顾目前关于肩肱关节脱位保守治疗的文献,并比较内旋和外旋固定的效果。使用关键词“肩肱关节脱位”、“肩关节脱位”、“固定”、“外旋”和“复发性脱位”在PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus和谷歌学术数据库中进行了全面的文献检索和综述,检索时间从数据库建立至2016年5月。共识别出3项尸体研究、6项影像学研究、10项临床研究和4项荟萃分析。临床研究共纳入734例患者。文献分析显示,在尸体和影像学研究中,外旋时盂唇在肩胛盂边缘的贴合更好。然而,临床研究中较低的再脱位率或更好的生活质量并未证实这一趋势。根据现有文献,与内旋相比,我们无法证实肩肱关节脱位后外旋固定的优越性。一组损伤模式特定的盂唇韧带损伤患者可能从外旋固定中获益,但具体情况尚待确定。需要进一步研究来确定这些患者。