Crockett Leah K, Brownell Marni D, Heaman Maureen I, Ruth Chelsea A, Prior Heather J
George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, 374-1 753 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0T6, Canada.
Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 408-727 McDermot Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 3P5, Canada.
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Dec;21(12):2141-2148. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2329-5.
Objective The late preterm population [34-36 weeks gestational age (GA)] is known to incur increased morbidity in the infancy stage compared to the population born at term (39-41 weeks GA). This study aimed to examine the health of these children during their early childhood years, with specific attention to the role of socioeconomic status. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, including all live-born children born at 34-36 and 39-41 weeks GA in urban Manitoba between 2000 and 2005 (n = 28,100). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of GA with early childhood morbidity after controlling for maternal, child and family level variables. Results The late preterm population was found to have significantly greater adjusted odds of lower respiratory tract infections in the preschool years (aOR = 1.59 [1.24, 2.04]) and asthma at school age (aOR = 1.33 [1.18, 1.47]) compared to the population born at term. The groups also differed in health care utilization at ages 4 (aOR = 1.19 [1.06,1.34]) and 7 years (aOR = 1.24 [1.09, 1.42]). Additional variables associated with poor outcomes suggest that social deprivation and GA simultaneously have a negative impact on early childhood development. Conclusions for Practice Adjustment for predictors of poor early childhood development, including socioeconomic status, were found to attenuate but not eliminate health differences between children born late preterm and children born at term. Poorer health outcomes that extend into childhood have implications for practice at the population level and suggest a need for further follow-up post discharge.
目的 已知晚期早产儿群体(孕龄34 - 36周)相比于足月儿群体(孕龄39 - 41周)在婴儿期会出现发病率增加的情况。本研究旨在调查这些儿童在幼儿期的健康状况,特别关注社会经济地位的作用。方法 采用曼尼托巴省卫生政策中心的数据进行回顾性队列研究,纳入2000年至2005年在曼尼托巴省城市地区出生的所有孕龄为34 - 36周和39 - 41周的活产儿(n = 28100)。在控制了母亲、儿童和家庭层面的变量后,使用多变量逻辑回归分析来研究孕龄与幼儿期发病率之间的关联。结果 与足月儿群体相比,晚期早产儿群体在学龄前出现下呼吸道感染的调整后优势比显著更高(调整后比值比[aOR]=1.59[1.24, 2.04]),在学龄期患哮喘的调整后优势比也更高(aOR = 1.33[1.18, 1.47])。两组在4岁(aOR = 1.19[1.06, 1.34])和7岁(aOR = 1.24[1.09, 1.42])时的医疗保健利用率也存在差异。与不良结局相关的其他变量表明,社会剥夺和孕龄同时对幼儿发育产生负面影响。实践结论 发现对包括社会经济地位在内的幼儿发育不良预测因素进行调整后,晚期早产儿和足月儿之间的健康差异有所减轻,但并未消除。延伸至儿童期的较差健康结局对人群层面的实践具有启示意义,并表明出院后需要进一步随访。