Suppr超能文献

在良性子宫切除术中使用机会性输卵管切除术。

The Use of Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To delineate the use of opportunistic salpingectomy over the study period, to examine factors associated with its use, and to evaluate whether salpingectomy was associated with perioperative complications.

DESIGN

A retrospective cross-sectional study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing ovarian-conserving hysterectomy for benign indications from January 2013 through April 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

The primary outcome was the performance of opportunistic salpingectomy with ovarian preservation during benign hysterectomy. The change in the rate of salpingectomy was examined at 4-month intervals to assess a period effect over the study period. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate independent effects of patient, operative, and period factors. Perioperative outcomes were compared using propensity score matching.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were 10 676 (55.9%) ovarian-conserving hysterectomies among 19 090 benign hysterectomies in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative in the study period. The rate of opportunistic salpingectomy was 45.8% (n = 4890). Rates of opportunistic salpingectomy increased over the study period from 27.5% to 61.6% (p < .001), demonstrating a strong period effect in the consecutive 4-month period analysis. Salpingectomy was more likely with the laparoscopic approach (odds ratio = 3.48; 95% confidence interval, 3.15-3.85) and among women younger than 60 years of age (odds ratio = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34-1.92). There was substantial variation in salpingectomy across hospital sites, ranging from 3.6% to 79.9%. Salpingectomy was associated with a 12-minute increase in operative time (p < .001), but there were no differences in the estimated blood loss or perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

The rates of salpingectomy increased significantly over the study period. The laparoscopic approach and younger age are associated with an increased probability of salpingectomy. Salpingectomy is not associated with increased blood loss or perioperative complications.

摘要

研究目的

描述在研究期间机会性输卵管切除术的应用情况,分析其应用相关的影响因素,并评估输卵管切除术是否与围手术期并发症相关。

设计

回顾性的队列研究(加拿大外科医师协会分级 II-2 级)。

设置

密歇根手术质量协作组。

患者

2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 4 月期间因良性指征接受卵巢保留的子宫切除术的女性。

干预

主要结局为在良性子宫切除术中行机会性输卵管切除术保留卵巢。每隔 4 个月检查一次输卵管切除术的发生率,以评估研究期间的时期效应。采用多变量逻辑回归评估患者、手术和时期因素的独立影响。采用倾向评分匹配比较围手术期结局。

测量和主要结果

在研究期间,密歇根手术质量协作组中,19090 例良性子宫切除术中,有 10676 例(55.9%)为卵巢保留的子宫切除术。机会性输卵管切除术的发生率为 45.8%(n=4890)。研究期间,机会性输卵管切除术的发生率从 27.5%增加到 61.6%(p<0.001),连续 4 个月的分析显示出强烈的时期效应。腹腔镜方法(比值比=3.48;95%置信区间,3.15-3.85)和年龄小于 60 岁的女性(比值比=1.60;95%置信区间,1.34-1.92)更有可能进行输卵管切除术。医院之间的输卵管切除术差异很大,从 3.6%到 79.9%不等。输卵管切除术与手术时间延长 12 分钟相关(p<0.001),但估计失血量和围手术期并发症无差异。

结论

在研究期间,输卵管切除术的比例显著增加。腹腔镜方法和年龄较小与输卵管切除术的概率增加相关。输卵管切除术不增加出血量或围手术期并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验