• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国预防性双侧输卵管切除术治疗卵巢癌的效果和安全性。

The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):270.e1-270.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.035
PMID:27810554
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death due to gynecologic malignancy and the fifth most common cause of cancer deaths in developed countries. Recent evidence has indicated that the most common and lethal form of ovarian cancer originates in the distal fallopian tube, and recommendations for surgical removal of the fallopian tube (bilateral salpingectomy) at the time of other gynecologic surgeries (particularly hysterectomy and tubal sterilization) have been made, most recently by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the uptake and perioperative safety of bilateral salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization in the United States and to examine the factors associated with increased likelihood of bilateral salpingectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify all girls and women 15 years or older without gynecologic cancer who underwent inpatient hysterectomy or tubal sterilization, with and without bilateral salpingectomy, from 2008 through 2013. Weighted estimates of national rates of these procedures were calculated and the number of procedures performed estimated. Safety was assessed by examining rates of blood transfusions, perioperative complications, postprocedural infection, and fever, and adjusted odds ratios were calculated comparing hysterectomy with salpingectomy with hysterectomy alone.

RESULTS

We included 425,180 girls and women who underwent inpatient hysterectomy from 2008 through 2013 representing a national cohort of 2,036,449 (95% confidence interval, 1,959,374-2,113,525) girls and women. There was an increase in the uptake of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy of 371% across the study period, with 7.7% of all hysterectomies including bilateral salpingectomy in 2013 (15.8% among girls and women retaining their ovaries). There were only 1195 salpingectomies for sterilization, thus no further comparisons were possible. In the girls and women who had hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, there was no increased risk for blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.05) postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.07), postoperative infections (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.78), or fevers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.77) compared with women undergoing hysterectomy alone. Younger age, private for-profit hospital setting, larger hospital size, and indication for hysterectomy were all associated with increased likelihood of getting a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy in women retaining their ovaries.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy is significantly increasing in the United States and is not associated with increased risks of postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

卵巢癌是妇科恶性肿瘤导致死亡的主要原因,也是发达国家癌症死亡的第五大常见原因。最近的证据表明,最常见和最致命的卵巢癌形式起源于输卵管的远端,并且建议在其他妇科手术(特别是子宫切除术和输卵管绝育术)时同时切除输卵管(双侧输卵管切除术),最近美国妇产科医师大会也提出了这一建议。

目的

我们旨在评估在美国子宫切除术和输卵管绝育术中双侧输卵管切除术的采用率和围手术期安全性,并研究与双侧输卵管切除术可能性增加相关的因素。

研究设计

利用全国住院患者样本,确定了 2008 年至 2013 年间所有年龄在 15 岁及以上、无妇科癌症、接受住院子宫切除术或输卵管绝育术(包括或不包括双侧输卵管切除术)的女性。计算了这些手术的全国发生率的加权估计值,并估计了手术数量。通过检查输血、围手术期并发症、术后感染和发热的发生率来评估安全性,并通过比较同时行子宫切除术和输卵管切除术与单纯行子宫切除术的输血率、围手术期并发症率、术后感染率和发热率来计算调整后的优势比。

结果

我们纳入了 2008 年至 2013 年间接受住院子宫切除术的 425180 名女性,代表了 2036449 名(95%置信区间,1959374-2113525)女性的全国队列。研究期间,同时行子宫切除术和双侧输卵管切除术的比例增加了 371%,2013 年所有子宫切除术中有 7.7%包括双侧输卵管切除术(保留卵巢的女性中占 15.8%)。仅有 1195 例输卵管绝育术,因此无法进行进一步比较。在同时行子宫切除术和双侧输卵管切除术的女性中,输血风险没有增加(调整后的优势比,0.95;95%置信区间,0.86-1.05),术后并发症风险(调整后的优势比,0.97;95%置信区间,0.88-1.07)、术后感染风险(调整后的优势比,1.26;95%置信区间,0.90-1.78)或发热风险(调整后的优势比,1.33;95%置信区间,1.00-1.77)与单纯行子宫切除术的女性相比。年轻、私立营利性医院环境、更大的医院规模和子宫切除术的指征均与保留卵巢的女性双侧输卵管切除术的可能性增加相关。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,同时行子宫切除术和双侧输卵管切除术在美国显著增加,并且与术后并发症风险增加无关。

相似文献

1
The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.美国预防性双侧输卵管切除术治疗卵巢癌的效果和安全性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):270.e1-270.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
2
Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.延长机会性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌的安全性证据:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):172.e1-172.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 28.
3
Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.探讨加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省机会性输卵管切除术(salpingectomy)后早绝经的指标:一项队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):221.e1-221.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
4
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.剖宫产时行随机输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):106.e1-106.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
5
Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.美国剖宫产术中从输卵管结扎到偶然输卵管切除术的范式转变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):399.e1-399.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.074. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
6
Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention.机会性输卵管切除术:卵巢癌预防区域倡议的接受度、风险和并发症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;210(5):471.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
7
Risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy: a decision analysis.阴道子宫切除术中机会性输卵管切除术的风险与益处:一项决策分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):603.e1-603.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
The rapid adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease in the United States.美国在因良性妇科疾病行子宫切除术时快速采用机会性输卵管切除术。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):721.e1-721.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.028. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.阴道子宫切除术期间预防性输卵管切除术的可行性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):605.e1-605.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
10
The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.预防性输卵管切除术对卵巢癌死亡率和医疗保健成本的影响:呼吁普遍保险覆盖。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):397.e1-397.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Gauging the Magnitude of Missed Opportunity for Ovarian Cancer Prevention.评估卵巢癌预防错失机会的程度。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2810.
2
Risk-reducing salpingectomy: considerations from an OBGYN perspective.降低风险的输卵管切除术:妇产科视角的考量
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):1011. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14384-6.
3
Implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: Analyzing clinical practice and key characteristics.实施机会性输卵管切除术以预防卵巢癌:分析临床实践及关键特征。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Aug;104(8):1539-1549. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15128. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
4
Intergroup statement: opportunistic salpingectomy-molecular pathology, clinical outcomes and implications for practice (German Ovarian Cancer Commission, the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NOGGO), AGO Austria and AGO Swiss).多组织联合声明:机会性输卵管切除术——分子病理学、临床结果及对实践的影响(德国卵巢癌委员会、德国东北部妇科肿瘤学会(NOGGO)、奥地利AGO和瑞士AGO)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May;311(5):1451-1459. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07974-z. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
5
The potential for opportunistic salpingectomy to reduce ovarian cancer in women undergoing non-gynecologic surgery.在接受非妇科手术的女性中,进行择期输卵管切除术以降低卵巢癌风险的可能性。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Feb 14;58:101685. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101685. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Gynecologic Cancer Screening and Prevention: State of the Science and Practice.妇科癌症筛查与预防:科学现状与实践
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Mar;26(3):167-178. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01301-z. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
7
Evaluating Ovarian Cancer Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Acceptance: A Survey.评估降低卵巢癌风险的输卵管切除术的接受度:一项调查。
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Jan 1;5(1):187-194. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0566.
8
Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: Video education for the surgeon.预防性输卵管切除术治疗卵巢癌:外科医生的视频教育
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024 Mar 23;53:101368. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101368. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Development of Hydrosalpinx After Prior Vaginal Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingectomy.既往阴道子宫切除术和双侧输卵管切除术后输卵管积水的发生
Cureus. 2024 Jan 19;16(1):e52573. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52573. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Effect of salpingectomy versus tubal ligation on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis.输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术对患者术后伤口感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14543. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14543.