Department of Anesthesiology. Cincinnati Children's Hospital, 3333 Burnet Avenue MLC2 7031 Pain Research Center, Location R8 Room 547, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, USA.
Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Aug;145:106427. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
In a previous study (Krishnan, 2016) we identified a whole-brain pattern, the Vicarious Pain Signature (VPS), which predicts vicarious pain when participants observe pictures of strangers in pain. Here, we test its generalization to observation of pain in a close significant other. Participants experienced painful heat (Self-Pain) and observed their romantic partner in pain (Partner-Pain). We measured whether (i) the VPS would respond selectively to Partner-Pain and (ii) the Neurologic Pain Signature (NPS), a measure validated to track somatic pain, would selectively respond to Self-Pain, despite the high interpersonal closeness between partners. The Partner-Pain condition activated the VPS (t = 4.71, p = 0.00005), but not the NPS (t = -1.03, p = 0.308). The Self-Pain condition activated the NPS (t = 13.70, p < .00005), but not the VPS (t = -1.03 p = 0.308). Relative VPS-NPS response differences strongly discriminated Partner-Pain vs. Self-Pain (cross-validated accuracy=97%, p < .000001). Greater interpersonal closeness between partners predicted greater VPS responses during Partner-Pain (r = 0.388, p = 0.050) and greater unpleasantness when observing the romantic partner in pain (r = 0.559, p = 0.003). The VPS generalizes across empathy paradigms and to an interactive social setting, and strongly activates when observing a close significant other in pain. VPS responses may be modulated by relevant interpersonal relationship factors. Self-Pain and Partner-Pain evoke non-overlapping large-scale neural representations.
在之前的研究(Krishnan,2016)中,我们确定了一种全脑模式,即替代疼痛特征(VPS),当参与者观察到疼痛的陌生人的图片时,它可以预测替代疼痛。在这里,我们测试它对观察亲密的重要他人的疼痛的泛化。参与者经历了痛苦的热量(自我疼痛)并观察了他们的浪漫伴侣的疼痛(伴侣疼痛)。我们测量了(i)VPS 是否会选择性地对伴侣疼痛做出反应,以及(ii)神经疼痛特征(NPS),这是一种经过验证的跟踪躯体疼痛的测量方法,是否会对自我疼痛做出选择性反应,尽管伴侣之间的人际关系非常密切。伴侣疼痛条件激活了 VPS(t = 4.71,p = 0.00005),但不激活 NPS(t = -1.03,p = 0.308)。自我疼痛条件激活了 NPS(t = 13.70,p < 0.00005),但不激活 VPS(t = -1.03,p = 0.308)。相对 VPS-NPS 反应差异强烈区分了伴侣疼痛与自我疼痛(交叉验证准确率=97%,p < 0.000001)。伴侣之间的人际关系越密切,在伴侣疼痛期间 VPS 的反应越大(r = 0.388,p = 0.050),观察到浪漫伴侣疼痛时的不愉快程度越大(r = 0.559,p = 0.003)。VPS 跨同理心范式和互动社交环境泛化,并在观察亲密重要他人疼痛时强烈激活。VPS 反应可能受到相关人际关系因素的调节。自我疼痛和伴侣疼痛引起非重叠的大规模神经表示。