Krishnan Anjali, Woo Choong-Wan, Chang Luke J, Ruzic Luka, Gu Xiaosi, López-Solà Marina, Jackson Philip L, Pujol Jesús, Fan Jin, Wager Tor D
Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States.
Elife. 2016 Jun 14;5:e15166. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15166.
Understanding how humans represent others' pain is critical for understanding pro-social behavior. 'Shared experience' theories propose common brain representations for somatic and vicarious pain, but other evidence suggests that specialized circuits are required to experience others' suffering. Combining functional neuroimaging with multivariate pattern analyses, we identified dissociable patterns that predicted somatic (high versus low: 100%) and vicarious (high versus low: 100%) pain intensity in out-of-sample individuals. Critically, each pattern was at chance in predicting the other experience, demonstrating separate modifiability of both patterns. Somatotopy (upper versus lower limb: 93% accuracy for both conditions) was also distinct, located in somatosensory versus mentalizing-related circuits for somatic and vicarious pain, respectively. Two additional studies demonstrated the generalizability of the somatic pain pattern (which was originally developed on thermal pain) to mechanical and electrical pain, and also demonstrated the replicability of the somatic/vicarious dissociation. These findings suggest possible mechanisms underlying limitations in feeling others' pain, and present new, more specific, brain targets for studying pain empathy.
理解人类如何表征他人的疼痛对于理解亲社会行为至关重要。“共享体验”理论提出了躯体疼痛和替代性疼痛的共同脑表征,但其他证据表明,体验他人的痛苦需要专门的神经回路。我们将功能神经成像与多变量模式分析相结合,识别出了可分离的模式,这些模式能够在样本外个体中预测躯体疼痛(高与低:100%)和替代性疼痛(高与低:100%)的强度。至关重要的是,每种模式在预测另一种体验时都具有偶然性,这表明两种模式具有各自独立的可调节性。躯体定位(上肢与下肢:两种情况的准确率均为93%)也各不相同,分别位于躯体疼痛和替代性疼痛的体感相关回路与心理化相关回路中。另外两项研究证明了躯体疼痛模式(最初基于热痛建立)对机械性疼痛和电疼痛的通用性,同时也证明了躯体/替代性疼痛分离的可重复性。这些发现揭示了感受他人疼痛存在局限性的潜在机制,并为研究疼痛共情提供了新的、更具体的脑靶点。