Chowaniec Czesław, Chowaniec Małgorzata, Wilk Mateusz
Katedra i Zakład Medycyny Sądowej I Toksykologii Sądowo-Lekarskiej, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Katowice.
Katedra i Zakład Anatomii Prawidłowej, Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Katowice.
Wiad Lek. 2017;70(3 pt 2):649-654.
Creating medico-legal opinion is a sophisticated investigative, analytical, decision-making and creative process. Forensic medicine specialist in cooperation with clinical medicine consultants, on the basis of evidence analysis, which was gathered during procedures and contained in the acts has to create an objective and essential opinion. This opinion is a vital, very important and irreplaceable proof in every case. Judicial body consults with forensic medicine specialist or specialists if there are circumstances for settlement of which there is a need of classified informations - art. 193 of Penalty Code. Forensic medicine specialists face many difficulties which may have effect on quality, positiveness of opinion, compliance with the deadline, increasing expectancy of judicial body or sides. It is very difficult to find clinical specialists which except their clinical knowledge have basic knowledge about law, the role and duties of an court expert. In this article we discuss creating-opinion problems, role and position of court expert in confrontation with expectations of judicial body and the Justice with particular emphasis on medical mistakes and assessment of medical proceedings. We show the complexity of creating of medical opinions, especially these institutional.