Peeters Dominique, Sekeris Elke, Verschaffel Lieven, Luwel Koen
Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven - Campus BrusselsBrussels, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 30;8:1082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01082. eCollection 2017.
Some authors argue that age-related improvements in number line estimation (NLE) performance result from changes in strategy use. More specifically, children's strategy use develops from only using the origin of the number line, to using the origin and the endpoint, to eventually also relying on the midpoint of the number line. Recently, Peeters et al. (unpublished) investigated whether the provision of additional unlabeled benchmarks at 25, 50, and 75% of the number line, positively affects third and fifth graders' NLE performance and benchmark-based strategy use. It was found that only the older children benefitted from the presence of these benchmarks at the quartiles of the number line (i.e., 25 and 75%), as they made more use of these benchmarks, leading to more accurate estimates. A possible explanation for this lack of improvement in third graders might be their inability to correctly link the presented benchmarks with their corresponding numerical values. In the present study, we investigated whether labeling these benchmarks with their corresponding numerical values, would have a positive effect on younger children's NLE performance and quartile-based strategy use as well. Third and sixth graders were assigned to one of three conditions: (a) a condition with an empty number line bounded by 0 at the origin and 1,000 at the endpoint, (b) an condition with three additional external benchmarks without numerical labels at 25, 50, and 75% of the number line, and (c) a condition in which these benchmarks were labeled with 250, 500, and 750, respectively. Results indicated that labeling the benchmarks has a positive effect on third graders' NLE performance and quartile-based strategy use, whereas sixth graders already benefited from the mere provision of unlabeled benchmarks. These findings imply that children's benchmark-based strategy use can be stimulated by adding additional externally provided benchmarks on the number line, but that, depending on children's age and familiarity with the number range, these additional external benchmarks might need to be labeled.
一些作者认为,与年龄相关的数字线估计(NLE)性能的提高源于策略使用的变化。更具体地说,儿童的策略使用从仅使用数字线的起点,发展到使用起点和终点,最终还依赖于数字线的中点。最近,皮特斯等人(未发表)研究了在数字线的25%、50%和75%处提供额外的未标记基准,是否会对三年级和五年级学生的NLE性能以及基于基准的策略使用产生积极影响。结果发现,只有年龄较大的儿童受益于数字线四分位数处(即25%和75%)这些基准的存在,因为他们更多地使用了这些基准,从而得出更准确的估计。三年级学生缺乏这种提高的一个可能解释是,他们无法将呈现的基准与相应的数值正确联系起来。在本研究中,我们调查了用相应的数值标记这些基准,是否也会对年幼儿童的NLE性能和基于四分位数的策略使用产生积极影响。三年级和六年级学生被分配到三种条件之一:(a)一种条件是数字线为空,起点为0,终点为1000;(b)一种条件是在数字线的25%、50%和75%处有三个额外的无数字标签的外部基准;(c)一种条件是这些基准分别标记为250、500和750。结果表明,标记基准对三年级学生的NLE性能和基于四分位数的策略使用有积极影响,而六年级学生已经从仅提供未标记基准中受益。这些发现意味着,通过在数字线上添加额外的外部提供的基准,可以刺激儿童基于基准的策略使用,但根据儿童的年龄和对数字范围的熟悉程度,这些额外外部基准可能需要标记。