Shadur Julia M, Ninnemann Andrew L, Lim Aaron, Lejuez Carl W, MacPherson Laura
Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park.
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;31(5):625-635. doi: 10.1037/adb0000300. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
The current study examined the prospective relationship between distress tolerance (DT) and positive and negative cigarette smoking outcome expectancies, which are reliable predictors of the onset and maintenance of smoking behaviors. Data from a longitudinal study (N = 204) examining risk behaviors in adolescence were used to assess whether DT predicts individual differences in rate of change in smoking outcome expectancies over 4 annual assessment waves through adolescence. Adolescents (mean age at first wave: 13.03 years; SD = 0.88 years) completed a behavioral task assessing DT at baseline and a self-report measure of adolescent smoking expectancies annually across 4 years. Latent growth curve models were estimated to test our hypotheses. Results showed that DT at baseline did not significantly predict initial levels of negative affect reduction (NAR) expectancies, but NAR expectancies increased more quickly over time for adolescents with lower DT. Moreover, as hypothesized, DT did not prospectively predict significant changes in smoking expectancies outside of the domain of NAR, including negative physical feelings, negative social impression, and boredom reduction expectancies. These findings suggest that DT is a useful indicator of adolescent expectancies about the consequences of cigarette smoking, particularly those focused on reducing negative affect. Thus, DT may be an important target for preventing smoking initiation among adolescents via this putative mechanism. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed within the context of observed effect sizes. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究考察了痛苦耐受(DT)与吸烟的正负结果预期之间的前瞻性关系,而吸烟的正负结果预期是吸烟行为起始和维持的可靠预测指标。一项针对青少年风险行为的纵向研究(N = 204)的数据被用于评估DT是否能预测青少年在整个青春期4次年度评估中吸烟结果预期变化率的个体差异。青少年(首波平均年龄:13.03岁;标准差 = 0.88岁)在基线时完成了一项评估DT的行为任务,并在4年中每年完成一项青少年吸烟预期的自我报告测量。通过估计潜在增长曲线模型来检验我们的假设。结果显示,基线时的DT并不能显著预测负面影响减轻(NAR)预期的初始水平,但对于DT较低的青少年,NAR预期随时间增长得更快。此外,正如所假设的,DT并不能前瞻性地预测NAR领域之外的吸烟预期的显著变化,包括负面身体感受、负面社会印象和无聊减轻预期。这些发现表明,DT是青少年对吸烟后果预期的一个有用指标,特别是那些专注于减轻负面影响的预期。因此,通过这种假定机制,DT可能是预防青少年吸烟起始的一个重要靶点。在观察到的效应大小的背景下讨论了理论和临床意义。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》