Josephine Königbauer, Josefine Letsch, Philipp Doebler, David Ebert, Harald Baumeister
University of Ulm, Institute of Psychology and Education, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Germany.
TU Dortmund University, Faculty of Statistics, Chair of Statistical Methods in Social Sciences, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Dec 1;223:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
To summarize and critically evaluate the effectiveness of internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) for depression in adults with a diagnosed depression.
Preregistered systematic review of RCTs investigating internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) targeting adults with diagnosed depression. IMIs had to be compared with waitlist, attention placebo, other IMIs or other (face-to-face) therapies. A comprehensive search of primary studies was conducted. Study selection and data extraction was done by two independent researchers. Primary outcome was symptom severity of depression. Furthermore, treatment response, depression remission, treatment adherence, anxiety and quality of life were investigated. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where possible, as well as pre-planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
Database search resulted in 4858 references, of which 19 studies were eligible for inclusion and provided data on 29 IMIs. IMIs showed beneficial effects on depression severity when compared to waitlist conditions at the end of treatment (pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) g = -0.90, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.73, n = 10). The comparison between different IMIs did not result in any superiority or inferiority. All IMIs reduced depression symptoms from pre- to post-treatment (within group SMD range -2.24; -0.64, n = 29) and from pre-treatment to follow-up assessments (SMD range -3.07; -0.93, n = 27).
IMIs significantly reduce depression symptoms in adults with diagnosed depression at the end of treatment and at follow-up assessments when compared to waitlist conditions. These findings argue for IMIs to be recommended in depression treatment guidelines.
总结并严格评估基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施(IMIs)对已确诊抑郁症成年人的有效性。
对针对已确诊抑郁症成年人的基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施(IMIs)的随机对照试验进行预注册系统评价。IMIs必须与等待名单、注意力安慰剂、其他IMIs或其他(面对面)疗法进行比较。对原始研究进行了全面检索。研究选择和数据提取由两名独立研究人员完成。主要结局是抑郁症的症状严重程度。此外,还调查了治疗反应、抑郁症缓解情况、治疗依从性、焦虑和生活质量。尽可能进行随机效应荟萃分析,以及预先计划的亚组分析和敏感性分析。
数据库检索产生了4858条参考文献,其中19项研究符合纳入标准,并提供了29种IMIs的数据。与治疗结束时的等待名单条件相比,IMIs对抑郁症严重程度显示出有益效果(合并标准化平均差(SMD)g = -0.90,95%CI -1.07至-0.73,n = 10)。不同IMIs之间的比较未显示出任何优越性或劣势。所有IMIs在治疗前至治疗后(组内SMD范围-2.24;-0.64,n = 29)以及治疗前至随访评估(SMD范围-3.07;-0.93,n = 27)均减轻了抑郁症状。
与等待名单条件相比,IMIs在治疗结束时和随访评估中显著减轻了已确诊抑郁症成年人的抑郁症状。这些发现支持在抑郁症治疗指南中推荐IMIs。