Loch Alexander, Bewersdorf Jan Philipp, Kofink Daniel, Ismail Dzafir, Abidin Imran Zainal, Veriah Ramesh Singh
Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 17;10(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2617-6.
In a world of ever increasing health care costs, generic drugs represent a major opportunity to ensure access to essential medicines for people who otherwise would be unable to afford them. However, some clinicians and patients are still questioning the safety and effectiveness of generic formulations compared to the proprietary drugs necessitating further systematic research analyzing the generic drugs' efficacy. Our objective was to compare the lipid lowering effects of generic and branded atorvastatin.
This cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Centre from 1 May 2013 until 30 May 2013. We analyzed the lipid profiles (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides) of 629 patients before and at least 3 months after switching them from proprietary atorvastatin (Lipitor) to generic atorvastatin (atorvastatin calcium from Ranbaxy Laboratories, Inc.). We also investigated if there was any difference in the effectiveness of both atorvastatin formulations in various ethnic groups.
266 patients were included in this study. When comparing the median values we found no statistically significant differences (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; p < 0.05) between proprietary and generic atorvastatin in lowering total cholesterol (4.60 mmol/l pre-transition vs. 4.50 mmol/l post-transition; p = 0.583), LDL-cholesterol (2.42 mmol/l vs. 2.41 mmol/l; p = 0.923) and triglycerides (1.50 mmol/l vs. 1.50 mmol/l; p = 0.513). While there was a statistically significant (p = 0.009) difference in HDL-cholesterol levels favouring proprietary atorvastatin, the extent of this change (1.26 mmol/l vs. 1.25 mmol/l) was deemed not to be clinically relevant. There was no statistically significant difference when analyzing the effects on various ethnic groups.
Substituting proprietary atorvastatin for its generic formulation atorvastatin calcium does not result in a less effective management of hyperlipidemia. Our findings lend support to the approach of lowering health care costs by switching patients from branded drugs to their less expensive generic analogues.
在医疗保健成本不断攀升的世界中,仿制药为确保那些原本无力承担费用的人们能够获取基本药物提供了一个重大契机。然而,与专利药物相比,一些临床医生和患者仍对仿制药配方的安全性和有效性存疑,这就需要开展进一步的系统研究来分析仿制药的疗效。我们的目标是比较仿制药和品牌阿托伐他汀的降脂效果。
这项横断面回顾性队列研究于2013年5月1日至2013年5月30日在马来亚大学医学中心进行。我们分析了629例患者从专利阿托伐他汀(立普妥)换用仿制药阿托伐他汀(兰伯西实验室有限公司生产的阿托伐他汀钙)之前及至少3个月后的血脂谱(总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯)。我们还研究了两种阿托伐他汀配方在不同种族群体中的有效性是否存在差异。
本研究纳入了266例患者。比较中位数时,我们发现专利阿托伐他汀和仿制药阿托伐他汀在降低总胆固醇(转换前4.60毫摩尔/升,转换后4.50毫摩尔/升;p = 0.583)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(2.42毫摩尔/升对2.41毫摩尔/升;p = 0.923)和甘油三酯(1.50毫摩尔/升对1.50毫摩尔/升;p = 0.513)方面无统计学显著差异。虽然在高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平上存在有利于专利阿托伐他汀的统计学显著差异(p = 0.009),但这种变化的幅度(1.26毫摩尔/升对1.25毫摩尔/升)被认为无临床相关性。分析对不同种族群体的影响时无统计学显著差异。
用仿制药阿托伐他汀钙替代专利阿托伐他汀不会导致高脂血症管理效果降低。我们的研究结果支持通过将患者从品牌药物转换为价格较低的仿制药类似物来降低医疗保健成本的做法。