• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Costs of Providing Infusion Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Hospital-based Infusion Center Setting.

作者信息

Schmier Jordana, Ogden Kristine, Nickman Nancy, Halpern Michael T, Cifaldi Mary, Ganguli Arijit, Bao Yanjun, Garg Vishvas

机构信息

Exponent, Alexandria, Virginia.

Health Economics, ICON plc, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1600-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.007
PMID:28716293
Abstract

PURPOSE

Many hospital-based infusion centers treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with intravenous biologic agents, yet may have a limited understanding of the overall costs of infusion in this setting. The purposes of this study were to conduct a microcosting analysis from a hospital perspective and to develop a model using an activity-based costing approach for estimating costs associated with the provision of hospital-based infusion services (preparation, administration, and follow-up) in the United States for maintenance treatment of moderate to severe RA.

METHODS

A spreadsheet-based model was developed. Inputs included hourly wages, time spent providing care, supply/overhead costs, laboratory testing, infusion center size, and practice pattern information. Base-case values were derived from data from surveys, published studies, standard cost sources, and expert opinion. Costs are presented in year-2017 US dollars. The base case modeled a hospital infusion center serving patients with RA treated with abatacept, tocilizumab, infliximab, or rituximab.

FINDINGS

Estimated overall costs of infusions per patient per year were $36,663 (rituximab), $36,821 (tocilizumab), $44,973 (infliximab), and $46,532 (abatacept). Of all therapies, the biologic agents represented the greatest share of overall costs, ranging from 87% to $91% of overall costs per year. Excluding infusion drug costs, labor accounted for 53% to 57% of infusion costs.

IMPLICATIONS

Biologic agents represented the highest single cost associated with RA infusion care; however, personnel, supplies, and overhead costs also contributed substantially to overall costs (8%-16%). This model may provide a helpful and adaptable framework for use by hospitals in informing decision making about services offered and their associated financial implications.

摘要

相似文献

1
Costs of Providing Infusion Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Hospital-based Infusion Center Setting.在医院输液中心环境下为类风湿关节炎提供输液治疗的成本。
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1600-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
Costs of providing infusion therapy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a hospital-based infusion center setting.在医院输液中心为炎症性肠病患者提供输液治疗的成本。
J Med Econ. 2017 Apr;20(4):409-422. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1285779. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
Cost of biologics per treated patient across immune-mediated inflammatory disease indications in a pharmacy benefit management setting: a retrospective cohort study.药房效益管理环境下免疫介导炎症性疾病适应症中每位接受治疗患者的生物制剂成本:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2014 Aug 1;36(8):1231-41, 1241.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
4
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, tocilizumab and TNF-inhibitors compared with rituximab as second-line biologic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.阿巴西普、托珠单抗和 TNF 抑制剂与利妥昔单抗作为类风湿关节炎二线生物药物的成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220142. eCollection 2019.
5
Cost-effectiveness of early treatment of ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients with abatacept.早期使用阿巴西普治疗抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性类风湿关节炎患者的成本效益分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 May-Jun;36(3):448-454. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
6
Analysis of drug and administrative costs allowed by U.S. Private and public third-party payers for 3 intravenous biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis.美国私人和公共第三方支付者对3种类风湿关节炎静脉注射生物制剂的药物及管理成本分析。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 May;17(4):313-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.4.313.
7
Cost-effectiveness simulation model of biologic strategies for treating to target rheumatoid arthritis in Germany.治疗德国靶向类风湿关节炎的生物策略的成本效益模拟模型。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 May-Jun;31(3):400-8. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
8
Incidence of dose escalation and impact on biologic costs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with three intravenous agents.三种静脉注射药物治疗的类风湿关节炎患者剂量递增的发生率及其对生物制剂成本的影响。
J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Nov;6(8):671-682. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0090. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Utilization and Costs of Biologic Therapies and JAK Inhibitor Therapy Across Four Common Inflammatory Indications in Adult US Managed Care Patients.一项回顾性队列研究:比较美国成年管理式医疗患者四种常见炎症指征下生物疗法和JAK抑制剂疗法的使用情况及成本
Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):626-42. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0312-y. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
10
A cost-cost study comparing etanercept with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis.一项比较依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的成本-成本研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(10):1051-64. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119100-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Experience and Improvement Opportunities in Self-Administered, Large-Volume Subcutaneous Infusions at Home.居家自行进行大容量皮下注射的患者体验及改进机会
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 13;19:2459-2491. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S515565. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost per Response of Acthar® Gel vs Standard of Care for the Treatment of Proteinuria in Nephrotic Syndrome Due to Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Among Adults from the US Healthcare Perspective.从美国医疗保健角度看,Acthar®凝胶与标准治疗方案治疗成人特发性膜性肾病所致肾病综合征蛋白尿的每反应成本。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Aug 6;12(2):50-61. doi: 10.36469/001c.142078. eCollection 2025.
3
ENTIMOS: Decision Support Tool Highlights Potential Impact of Non-intravenous Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis on Patient Care via Clinical Scenario Simulation.
ENTIMOS:决策支持工具通过临床情景模拟突出了多发性硬化症非静脉治疗对患者护理的潜在影响。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Sep;8(5):755-764. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00493-8. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Navigating Access and Optimizing Medication Infusions in an Academic Medical Center: A Quality Improvement Study.在学术医疗中心实现静脉输液通路管理与优化:一项质量改进研究
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;11(4):111. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11040111.
5
The potential cost-effectiveness of novel cord blood therapies in children with autism spectrum disorder.新型脐带血疗法治疗儿童自闭症谱系障碍的潜在成本效益。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 18;18(4):e0282906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282906. eCollection 2023.
6
A Budget Impact Model of Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy with IgPro20 (Hizentra) Relative to Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the United States.在美国,与静脉注射免疫球蛋白相比,IgPro20(Hizentra)用于慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病维持治疗的预算影响模型。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Mar;7(2):243-255. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00386-2. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
Adherence patterns in naïve and prevalent use of infliximab and its biosimilar.英夫利昔单抗及其生物类似药初治和常用时的依从模式。
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Nov 1;6(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00295-7.
8
Trends and frontiers of research on pharmacoeconomics from 2012-2021: a scientometric analysis.2012 - 2021年药物经济学研究趋势与前沿:一项科学计量分析
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Mar;10(6):327. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1050.
9
Payer Perspectives on Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Administration of Drugs.支付方对药物静脉注射与皮下注射给药方式的看法。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Sep 10;13:801-807. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S317687. eCollection 2021.
10
Comparison of Adverse Events Among Home- vs Facility-Administered Biologic Infusions, 2007-2017.2007-2017 年家庭与机构实施生物制剂输注的不良事件比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2110268. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10268.