文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

肥胖产妇剖宫产术后封闭切口负压治疗:一项随机对照试验

Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Gunatilake Ravindu P, Swamy Geeta K, Brancazio Leo R, Smrtka Michael P, Thompson Jennifer L, Gilner Jennifer B, Gray Beverly A, Heine Robert Phillips

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

AJP Rep. 2017 Jul;7(3):e151-e157. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603956. Epub 2017 Jul 14.


DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1603956
PMID:28717587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5511052/
Abstract

Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied.  We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (SOC) dressing.  A single-center randomized controlled trial compared ciNPT (5-7 days) to SOC dressing (1-2 days) in obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35), undergoing cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2014. Participants were randomized 1:1 and monitored 42 ± 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome SSOs included unanticipated local inflammation, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, and need for surgical or antibiotic intervention.  Of the 92 randomized patients, 82 completed the study. ciNPT and SOC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Mean BMI was 46.5 ± 6.5 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Compared with SOC, the ciNPT group had fewer SSOs (7/43 [16.3%] vs. 2/39 [5.1%], respectively; = 0.16); significantly fewer participants with less incisional pain both at rest (39/46 [84.8%] vs. 20/46 [43.5%];  < 0.001) and with incisional pressure (42/46 [91.3%] vs. 25/46 [54.3%]; < 0.001); and a 30% decrease in total opioid use (79.1 vs. 55.9 mg morphine equivalents, = 0.036).  A trend in SSO reduction and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and narcotic use was observed in women using ciNPT.

摘要

剖宫产术后伤口发病是剖宫产分娩的一种代价高昂的并发症,针对其预防策略的研究仍不充分。我们比较了接受闭合切口负压疗法(ciNPT)或标准护理(SOC)敷料的剖宫产患者的手术部位事件(SSO)。一项单中心随机对照试验在2012年至2014年期间对肥胖女性(体重指数[BMI]≥35)进行剖宫产时,将ciNPT(5 - 7天)与SOC敷料(1 - 2天)进行了比较。参与者按1:1随机分组,并在术后42±10天进行监测。主要结局SSO包括意外的局部炎症、伤口感染、血清肿、血肿、裂开以及手术或抗生素干预的需求。在92名随机分组的患者中,82名完成了研究。ciNPT组和SOC组具有相似的基线特征。平均BMI为46.5±6.5,且无治疗相关的严重不良事件。与SOC相比,ciNPT组的SSO较少(分别为7/43[16.3%]和2/39[5.1%];P = 0.16);静息时切口疼痛较轻的参与者明显较少(39/46[84.8%]对20/46[43.5%];P < 0.001),切口受压时也是如此(42/46[91.3%]对25/46[54.3%];P < 0.001);总阿片类药物使用量减少30%(吗啡当量分别为79.1和55.9毫克,P = 0.036)。在使用ciNPT的女性中观察到SSO减少的趋势以及术后疼痛和麻醉药物使用的统计学显著减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/c1160a32da64/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/5be158efa783/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/3d993b36f48a/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/7eeb3778064f/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/e33391757d1b/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/c1160a32da64/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/5be158efa783/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/3d993b36f48a/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/7eeb3778064f/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/e33391757d1b/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a098/5511052/c1160a32da64/10-1055-s-0037-1603956-i170022-5.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

AJP Rep. 2017-7

[2]
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Morbidly Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obstet Gynecol. 2019-10

[3]
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Achieves Better Outcome Than Standard Wound Care: Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Open Ventral Hernia Repair With Synthetic Mesh Positioning.

Cureus. 2020-5-26

[4]
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Effects on Postoperative Infection and Surgical Site Complication After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2017-6-17

[5]
Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA. 2020-9-22

[6]
Cost-Effectiveness of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy for Surgical Site Management After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

J Arthroplasty. 2022-8

[7]
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy on wound complications after cesarean delivery in women with obesity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022-5

[8]
Closed Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) Reduces Minor Local Complications in Post-bariatric Abdominoplasty Body Contouring: a Retrospective Case-Control Series.

Obes Surg. 2018-7

[9]
The Effectiveness of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Versus Silver-Impregnated Dressings in Mitigating Surgical Site Complications in High-Risk Patients After Revision Knee Arthroplasty: The PROMISES Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Arthroplasty. 2021-7

[10]
Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Efficacy in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in High-Risk Patients: A Meta-analysis.

J Surg Res. 2019-4-19

引用本文的文献

[1]
Prospective evaluation of a closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy system in kidney transplantation and its association with wound complications.

Front Nephrol. 2024-2-27

[2]
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Two Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices to Manage Cesarean Section Incisions.

Am J Perinatol. 2024-5

[3]
Meta-analysis of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections (SSI) in caesarean section surgery.

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023-6

[4]
Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection: an up-to-date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

EClinicalMedicine. 2023-7-24

[5]
A systematic review with meta-analysis on prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressing for obese women after caesarean section.

Nurs Open. 2023-9

[6]
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023-3-16

[7]
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-4-26

[8]
Within-patient randomized clinical trial comparing incisional negative-pressure wound therapy with suction drains in gender-affirming mastectomies.

Br J Surg. 2021-8-19

[9]
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on closed incisions to prevent surgical site infection in high-risk patients in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial-the NP-SSI trial.

Trials. 2020-11-9

[10]
Four Curious Cases of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT).

Cureus. 2020-5-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effect of Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Postcesarean Infections and Wound Complications for High-Risk Patients.

J Reprod Med. 2015

[2]
Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014-6

[3]
Incisional negative pressure therapy to prevent wound complications following cesarean section in morbidly obese women: a pilot study.

Surg Innov. 2014-8

[4]
Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013-1

[5]
Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012-10-27

[6]
A cross-sectional analysis of the effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient controlled analgesia on postcesarean pain and breastfeeding.

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012

[7]
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Int J Surg. 2011-10-12

[8]
Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after high-risk lower extremity fractures.

J Orthop Trauma. 2012-1

[9]
Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011-3

[10]
Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索