• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验研究剖宫产皮肤缝合中皮内缝合与皮肤钉合的伤口并发症发生率。

Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lehigh ValleyHealthNetwork, Allentown, PA 18104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):285.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011
PMID:20816153
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the wound complication rates and patient satisfaction for subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized prospective trial. Subjects who underwent cesarean delivery were assigned randomly to stainless steel staples or subcuticular 4.0 Monocryl sutures. The primary outcomes were composite wound complication rate and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 435 patients were assigned randomly. Staple closure was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of wound separation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.07-10.52; P < .001). Having a wound complication was associated with a 5-fold decrease in patient satisfaction (aOR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09-0.37; P < .001). After confounders were controlled for, there was no difference in satisfaction between the treatment groups (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34-1.50; P = .63).

CONCLUSION

Use of staples for cesarean delivery closure is associated with an increased risk of wound complications. Occurrence of a wound complication is the most important factor that influenced patient satisfaction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较剖宫产切口皮内缝合与皮肤钉合的伤口并发症发生率和患者满意度。

研究设计

这是一项随机前瞻性试验。接受剖宫产的受试者被随机分配接受不锈钢钉或皮下 4.0 可吸收缝线缝合。主要结局是复合伤口并发症发生率和患者满意度。

结果

共有 435 名患者被随机分配。皮钉缝合与伤口分离的风险增加 4 倍相关(调整后的优势比 [aOR],4.66;95%置信区间 [CI],2.07-10.52;P<.001)。发生伤口并发症与患者满意度降低 5 倍相关(aOR,0.18;95%CI,0.09-0.37;P<.001)。在控制混杂因素后,两组治疗的满意度无差异(aOR,0.71;95%CI,0.34-1.50;P=0.63)。

结论

剖宫产切口皮钉缝合与伤口并发症风险增加相关。伤口并发症的发生是影响患者满意度的最重要因素。

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.随机对照试验研究剖宫产皮肤缝合中皮内缝合与皮肤钉合的伤口并发症发生率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):285.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011.
2
Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.剖宫产术中皮内缝合与皮下缝合缝合线对比:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.018. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
3
Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.对比 III 类肥胖女性剖宫产术中使用缝线与皮内缝合的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.剖宫产皮下皮肤缝合缝线材料的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):490.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.一项比较剖宫产皮肤缝合方式的随机研究:吻合钉与皮下缝合。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):265.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.019.
6
A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples.一项关于使用可吸收皮下缝合钉进行全髋关节伤口闭合的随机前瞻性研究。
Orthopedics. 2010 Sep 7;33(9):665. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100722-12.
7
Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.体质量指数为 40 或更高的剖宫产切口缝合与订书钉缝合的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan;3(1):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100271. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
8
Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.剖宫产术后使用皮下可吸收缝合钉进行皮肤缝合与减少镇痛药物使用相关。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Apr;285(4):979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2121-5. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
9
Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.根据糖尿病状况,比较剖宫产皮肤缝合时使用吻合钉与缝线的伤口发病率。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(2):279-82. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.998647. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.肥胖女性剖宫产术后伤口并发症:皮肤钉合与皮下缝合的比较
J Perinatol. 2016 Oct;36(10):819-22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.89. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Stapler for corneal transplantation: a hypothesis.角膜移植吻合器:一种假说。
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025 May 10;14(1):239-246. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1515. eCollection 2025 Spring.
2
Superiority trial for the development of an ideal method for the closure of midline abdominal wall incisions to reduce the incidence of wound complications after elective gastroenterological surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经腹正中切口关闭术以减少择期胃肠外科手术后切口并发症发生率的理想方法的开发:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 May 17;25(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08167-w.
3
Comparative Study of Use of Reusable Skin Staples and Vertical Mattress Sutures in the Closure of Midline Laparotomy Wounds.
可重复使用皮肤吻合钉与垂直褥式缝合用于中线剖腹手术伤口闭合的比较研究
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_50_23. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Clinical Equivalence of Monoglyde® and Monocryl® Absorbable Poliglecaprone-25 Sutures: A Single-Blind, Randomized Study.Monoglyde®和Monocryl®可吸收聚乙醇酸-25缝线的临床等效性:一项单盲随机研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 12;15(5):e38938. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38938. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Subcuticular suture and incisional surgical-site infection in elective hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: an open-label, pragmatic randomized clinical trial (CLOSKIN trial).皮下缝合与切口部位手术感染在择期肝胆胰腺手术中的作用:一项开放标签、实用随机临床试验(CLOSKIN 试验)。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01911-0.
6
Comparison of the effect of skin closure materials on skin closure during cesarean delivery.比较剖宫产术中不同皮肤缝合材料对切口愈合的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0270337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270337. eCollection 2022.
7
Effect of Complementary Medicine on Pain Relief and Wound Healing after Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review.辅助医学对剖宫产术后疼痛缓解及伤口愈合的影响:一项系统评价
J Pharmacopuncture. 2021 Jun 30;24(2):41-53. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2021.24.2.41.
8
Staples Versus Sutures for Skin Closure in Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.标准四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中皮肤缝合用吻合钉与缝线的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2021 Mar 6;13(3):e13725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13725.
9
Surgical wound closure by staples or sutures?: Systematic review.使用吻合钉或缝线进行手术伤口闭合:系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20573. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020573.
10
Wound complication among different skin closure techniques in the emergency cesarean section: a randomized control trial.急诊剖宫产不同皮肤缝合技术的伤口并发症:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jan;63(1):27-34. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.27. Epub 2019 Dec 23.