Del Baño-Aledo María Elena, Martínez-Payá Jacinto Javier, Ríos-Díaz José, Mejías-Suárez Silvia, Serrano-Carmona Sergio, de Groot-Ferrando Ana
ECOFISTEM Research Group, Health Sciences Deparment, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, UCAM, Guadalupe (Murcia), Spain.
Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael-Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017 May 10;7(1):192-199. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.192. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
Ultrasound imaging is often used by physiotherapists and other healthcare professionals but the reliability of image acquisition with different ultrasound machines is unknown. The objective was to compare the intra-rater, inter-rater and intermachine reliability of thickness measurements of the plantar fascia (PF), Achilles tendon (AT), patellar tendon (PT) and elbow common extensor tendon (ECET) with musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging (MSUS).
Tendon thickness was measured in four anatomical structures (14 participants, 28 images per tendon) by two sonographers and with two different ultrasound machines. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots were calculated. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable difference (MDD) were calculated.
Inter-rater reliability was excellent for AT (ICC=0.98; 95% CI= 0.96-0.99) and very good for PT (ICC=0.85; 95% CI = 0.67-0.93) and ECET (ICC=0.81; 95% CI= 0.72-0.94). Reliability for PF was moderate, with an ICC of 0.63 (CI 95%= 0.20-0.83). Bland-Altman plot for inter-machine reliability showed a mean difference of 1 m for PF measurements and a mean difference of 4 m and 20 m for AT and PT. The relative SEMs were below 7% and the MDCs were below 0.7 mm.
The MSUS reliability in measuring thickness of the four tendons is confirmed by the homogeneous readings intra sonographers, between operators and between different machines. Level of evidence: Tendon thickness can be measured reliably on different ultrasound devices, which is an important step forward in the use of this technique in daily clinical practice and research.
III.
物理治疗师和其他医疗保健专业人员经常使用超声成像,但不同超声机器图像采集的可靠性尚不清楚。目的是比较肌肉骨骼超声成像(MSUS)测量足底筋膜(PF)、跟腱(AT)、髌腱(PT)和肘部伸肌总腱(ECET)厚度时的同评者、不同评者及不同机器之间的可靠性。
两名超声检查人员使用两台不同的超声机器对14名参与者的四个解剖结构(每条肌腱28张图像)的肌腱厚度进行测量。计算组内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德-奥特曼图。计算测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测差异(MDD)。
不同评者间测量跟腱的可靠性极佳(ICC=0.98;95%CI=0.96-0.99),髌腱(ICC=0.85;95%CI=0.67-0.93)和肘部伸肌总腱(ICC=0.81;95%CI=0.72-0.94)的可靠性很好。足底筋膜测量的可靠性为中等,ICC为0.63(95%CI=0.20-0.83)。不同机器间可靠性的布兰德-奥特曼图显示,足底筋膜测量的平均差异为1mm,跟腱和髌腱测量的平均差异分别为4mm和20mm。相对SEM低于7%,MDC低于0.7mm。
超声检查人员之间、操作人员之间以及不同机器之间测量这四条肌腱厚度的读数具有同质性,证实了MSUS测量的可靠性。证据水平:在不同超声设备上可以可靠地测量肌腱厚度,这是该技术在日常临床实践和研究中应用的重要进展。
III级