Barrett Catriona, O'Brien Colm, Butler John S, Loughman James
School of Physics and Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland.
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jan;101(1):90-99. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12573. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
This research was designed to provide an in-depth exploration of the perceptions of optometrists relating to the challenges of glaucoma case finding in the Irish health-care system.
A survey was developed, piloted and distributed for anonymous completion by optometrists registered to practise in Ireland. The survey included 10 five-level Likert items exploring potential barriers to glaucoma detection and a free-text box for participants to comment more broadly.
One hundred and ninety-nine optometrists (27 per cent of registrants) responded to the survey. Among the barriers identified, there was notable agreement (71 per cent) with the need for extra training on glaucoma detection. Logistic regression showed that optometrists without postgraduate qualifications were more likely to agree with the need for extra training (OR 3.2, 95 per cent CI 1.3-8.1). Respondents largely agreed (61 per cent) that patient unwillingness to pay additional fees for supplementary glaucoma-specific tests was also a barrier. Appointment times of less than 30 minutes were significantly associated with six of the 10 proposed barriers to glaucoma detection. A logistic regression analysis (n = 179) confirmed that the time allotted per appointment was a significant predictor of the agreement time of optometrists as a barrier (χ [1] = 13.52, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression showed that optometrists with less experience, charging lower fees, and working in large multiples or franchised practices have the shortest appointment times.
The strong link found between postgraduate education and the confidence of optometrists in detecting glaucoma indicates that optometrists wishing to increase their scope of practice in the new legislative environment in Ireland may more actively seek training in areas of interest. The responses also indicate a lack of funding for the level of diagnostic testing required for accurate glaucoma diagnosis. Recent increases in the state's eye examination fees look likely to address the identified time and financial barriers to glaucoma detection in Ireland. Future work should look to analyse the effects of increased funding on optometric case finding for glaucoma.
本研究旨在深入探讨爱尔兰医疗保健系统中验光师对青光眼病例发现挑战的看法。
设计了一项调查问卷,进行了预试验,并分发给在爱尔兰注册执业的验光师,要求他们匿名填写。该调查问卷包含10个五级李克特量表项目,用于探究青光眼检测的潜在障碍,还设有一个自由文本框,供参与者进行更广泛的评论。
199名验光师(占注册人员的27%)回复了调查问卷。在所确定的障碍中,对于需要接受青光眼检测方面的额外培训,存在显著的共识(71%)。逻辑回归分析表明,没有研究生学历的验光师更有可能认同需要额外培训(比值比3.2,95%置信区间1.3 - 8.1)。受访者大多认同(61%)患者不愿为补充性青光眼专项检测支付额外费用也是一个障碍。30分钟以内的预约时间与所提出的10项青光眼检测障碍中的6项显著相关。一项逻辑回归分析(n = 179)证实,每次预约的时间分配是验光师认同某一障碍的显著预测因素(χ[1] = 13.52,p < 0.001)。多元线性回归显示,经验较少、收费较低且在大型连锁或特许经营机构工作的验光师预约时间最短。
研究生教育与验光师青光眼检测信心之间的紧密联系表明,希望在爱尔兰新立法环境中扩大执业范围的验光师可能会更积极地寻求感兴趣领域的培训。这些回复还表明,缺乏用于准确青光眼诊断所需诊断检测水平的资金。近期国家眼科检查费用的增加似乎有望解决爱尔兰青光眼检测中已确定的时间和资金障碍。未来的工作应着眼于分析资金增加对青光眼验光病例发现的影响。