Kelly Martin, Feeley Iain, Boland Fiona, O'Byrne John M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan-Feb;75(1):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints are the second most common reason for a hospital outpatient appointment in the US, and account for 19.5% of general practice consultations. Previous studies have shown that passive teaching in medical school does not imbue students with an adequate degree of confidence in MSK evaluation. The aim of this study was to conduct a randomized control trial to compare the effect of the gold standard small group tutorial of bedside teaching against case-based teaching (CBT) in relation to orthopedic surgery in medical students.
All third-year medical students at our institution were invited to participate in a randomized control trial comparing CBT and bedside tutorials in relation to MSK. The primary outcome was student performance in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Participants were randomized into 2 groups, receiving either a bedside tutorial or a case-based tutorial. Participants were then assigned self-directed learning before undergoing a final OSCE assessment. Student feedback was attained through a poststudy questionnaire.
Complete data was acquired for 96 study participants (n = 45 CBT; n = 51 bedside tutorial). The results of a linear regression model used to assess differences in the final OSCE scores, adjusting for the baseline OSCE score, gender, age, previous problem-based learning exposure and whether English was their first language or not showed no evidence of a difference between the bedside teaching group and the CBT group (mean difference: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: -3.79 to 4.47; p = 0.872). Almost all (95%) of the study participants felt that CBT was an important component in their learning.
There was no difference in OSCE performance between groups. The introduction of CBT before clinical placement in medical school could accentuate the clinical skills of students before transition into the apprenticeship model of clinical attachment.
肌肉骨骼(MSK)问题是美国医院门诊预约的第二大常见原因,占全科医疗咨询的19.5%。先前的研究表明,医学院校的被动式教学无法使学生在MSK评估中获得足够的信心。本研究的目的是进行一项随机对照试验,比较针对医学生骨科手术的金标准床边教学小组辅导与基于案例的教学(CBT)的效果。
邀请我校所有三年级医学生参加一项随机对照试验,比较CBT和床边辅导在MSK方面的效果。主要结果是学生在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中的表现。参与者被随机分为两组,分别接受床边辅导或基于案例的辅导。然后,参与者在接受最终OSCE评估之前被安排进行自主学习。通过研究后的问卷获得学生反馈。
获取了96名研究参与者的完整数据(n = 45,CBT组;n = 51,床边辅导组)。用于评估最终OSCE分数差异的线性回归模型结果,在调整基线OSCE分数、性别、年龄、先前基于问题的学习经历以及英语是否为其第一语言后,没有显示出床边教学组和CBT组之间存在差异的证据(平均差异:0.34;95%置信区间:-3.79至4.47;p = 0.872)。几乎所有(95%)的研究参与者都认为CBT是他们学习中的一个重要组成部分。
两组在OSCE表现上没有差异。在医学院临床实习前引入CBT可以在学生过渡到临床实习的学徒模式之前强化他们的临床技能。