Suppr超能文献

医师助理如何将药剂师评定为药物信息来源。

How pharmacists are rated as a source of drug information by physician assistants.

作者信息

Fincham J E

出版信息

Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1986 May;20(5):379-83. doi: 10.1177/106002808602000510.

Abstract

A study to examine physician assistants' (PAs) views of drug information sources was undertaken in a sample of practicing PAs in Georgia. Analysis of Kendall's coefficient of concordance statistic indicated Pharm.D.s were ranked highest as being good sources of drug information of the six categories listed. Next in descending order of classification as good sources of drug information were the categories of journal articles, physicians, non-Pharm.D. pharmacists, detail persons, and physician assistants. A significant correlation was found between PA contact with pharmacists and the classification of pharmacists as good sources of drug information. The difference in rating between Pharm.D.s and journal articles and physicians was not significantly different, but the rating differences between these categories and each of the other sources were statistically significant. Pharm.D. pharmacists were rated higher as a source of drug information than were non-Pharm.D. pharmacists. Results indicate pharmacists are viewed positively as sources of drug information for PAs, and that view increases with contact with pharmacists.

摘要

在佐治亚州执业医师助理样本中开展了一项研究,以考察医师助理对药物信息来源的看法。肯德尔和谐系数统计分析表明,在列出的六个类别中,药学博士被评为药物信息的最佳来源。按药物信息良好来源的分类降序排列,接下来是期刊文章、医生、非药学博士药剂师、医药代表和医师助理。研究发现,医师助理与药剂师的接触情况和药剂师作为药物信息良好来源的分类之间存在显著相关性。药学博士与期刊文章及医生之间的评分差异不显著,但这些类别与其他每个来源之间的评分差异具有统计学意义。药学博士药剂师作为药物信息来源的评分高于非药学博士药剂师。结果表明,药剂师作为医师助理的药物信息来源受到积极看待,并且这种看法会随着与药剂师接触的增加而增强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验