Becciolini Andrea, Raimondo Maria Gabriella, Crotti Chiara, Agape Elena, Biggioggero Martina, Favalli Ennio Giulio
Department of Rheumatology.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Health Community, University of Milan, Division of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Jun 28;11:1969-1978. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S138515. eCollection 2017.
The introduction of biological agents drastically changed the treatment paradigm of inflammatory arthritides, ameliorating the natural history of the diseases but concomitantly increasing the drug costs due to the manufacturing process. On this concern, biosimilar drugs may represent a valid option for reducing this elevated cost and increasing the availability of these highly effective treatments. Recently, CT-P13, the first biosimilar of infliximab, has been approved with the same indications established for the reference product (RP), and its daily use is progressively increasing. However, the experience with biosimilar drugs in the field of rheumatology is still limited, raising potential doubts and concerns on their correct management in real-life settings. Comparability analysis between CT-P13 and its RP was evaluated in equivalence randomized controlled trials (RCTs) - PLANETRA and PLANETAS - performed on patients with rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondylitis, respectively. CT-P13 and RP showed similar profile in terms of quality, biological activity, safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. However, the interchangeability between infliximab RP and its biosimilar still represents the most challenging issue because of a lack of a long-lasting experience. To date, reassuring preliminary data on this topic were reported in open-label extensions of PLANETRA and PLANETAS RCTs and in ongoing real-life observational studies. These findings, taken all together, significantly affect the landscape of biosimilar regulatory pathways and strongly support CT-P13 introduction as a great opportunity for expanding the accessibility to these very effective and high-cost therapies.
生物制剂的引入极大地改变了炎性关节炎的治疗模式,改善了疾病的自然病程,但同时由于生产工艺导致药物成本增加。出于这一考虑,生物类似药可能是降低这种高昂成本并提高这些高效治疗药物可及性的一个有效选择。最近,英夫利昔单抗的首个生物类似药CT-P13已获批与参比产品(RP)相同的适应症,且其日常使用量正在逐步增加。然而,生物类似药在风湿病领域的应用经验仍然有限,这引发了对其在实际临床环境中正确管理的潜在疑虑。在分别针对类风湿关节炎和轴性脊柱关节炎患者开展的等效性随机对照试验(RCT)——PLANETRA和PLANETAS中,对CT-P13与其RP进行了可比性分析。CT-P13和RP在质量、生物活性、安全性、免疫原性和疗效方面表现出相似的特征。然而,由于缺乏长期经验,英夫利昔单抗RP与其生物类似药之间的可互换性仍然是最具挑战性的问题。迄今为止,在PLANETRA和PLANETAS RCT的开放标签扩展研究以及正在进行的实际临床观察研究中,已报告了关于这一主题的令人安心的初步数据。综合这些研究结果,显著影响了生物类似药监管途径的格局,并有力支持引入CT-P13,认为这是扩大这些非常有效但成本高昂的治疗方法可及性的一个绝佳机会。