Hernández-Vásquez Akram, Alarcon-Ruiz Christoper A, Bendezu-Quispe Guido, Comandé Daniel, Rosselli Diego
1Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru.
2Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima, Peru.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 Mar 27;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2. eCollection 2018.
Biosimilars could be a promising option to help decrease healthcare costs and expand access to treatment. There is no previous evidence of a global bibliometric analysis on biosimilars. Therefore, we aimed to assess the quantity and quality of worldwide biosimilars research.
We performed a bibliometric analysis using documents about biosimilars published until December 2016 in journals indexed in Scopus. We extracted the annual research, languages, countries, journals, authors, institutions, citation frequency, and the metrics of journals. The data were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2013. Additional information about authors' participation was obtained using the R-package Bibliometrix. Publication activity was adjusted for the countries by population size. Also, author co-citation analysis and a term co-occurrence analysis with the terms included in the title and abstract of publications was presented as network visualization maps using VOSviewer.
A total of 2330 biosimilar-related documents identified in the Scopus database, most of them were articles (1452; 62.32%). The number of documents published had an exponential increased between 2004 and 2016 ( < 0.001). The United States was the country with the highest production with 685 (29.40%) documents followed by Germany and UK with 293 (12.58%) and 248 (10.64%), respectively. Switzerland (11.05), Netherlands (5.85) and UK (3.83) showed the highest per capita ratio. The highest citation/article ratio were for the Netherlands (28.06), Spain (24.23), and France (20.11). published 73 (3.13%) documents; both and and 41 (1.76%). Three out of top ten journals were Trade publications. Amgen Incorporated from the USA was the most prolific institution with 51 documents followed by Pfizer Inc. with 48. Terms about specific diseases and drugs were found in recent years, compared with terms such as legislation, structure, protein, dose and generic in the early years.
Research production and publication of documents on biosimilars are increasing. The majority of publications came from high-income countries. The trends in terminology use are according to state of the art in the topic, and reflects the interest in the utilization of biosimilars in diseases who are expected to obtain benefits of its use.
生物类似药可能是有助于降低医疗成本和扩大治疗可及性的一个有前景的选择。此前尚无关于生物类似药的全球文献计量分析的证据。因此,我们旨在评估全球生物类似药研究的数量和质量。
我们使用截至2016年12月在Scopus索引期刊上发表的关于生物类似药的文献进行了文献计量分析。我们提取了年度研究、语言、国家、期刊、作者、机构、被引频次以及期刊指标。使用Microsoft Excel 2013对数据进行定量和定性分析。使用R包Bibliometrix获取关于作者参与情况的更多信息。根据国家人口规模对发表活动进行调整。此外,作者共被引分析以及对出版物标题和摘要中包含的术语进行的词共现分析以网络可视化地图的形式使用VOSviewer呈现。
在Scopus数据库中总共识别出2330篇与生物类似药相关的文献,其中大多数是文章(1452篇;62.32%)。2004年至2016年间发表的文献数量呈指数增长(<0.001)。美国是文献产量最高的国家,有685篇(29.40%)文献,其次是德国和英国,分别有293篇(12.58%)和248篇(10.64%)。瑞士(11.05)、荷兰(5.85)和英国(3.83)的人均比率最高。被引/文章比率最高的是荷兰(28.06)、西班牙(24.23)和法国(20.11)。[此处原文似乎有缺失信息]发表了73篇(3.13%)文献;[此处原文似乎有缺失信息]以及[此处原文似乎有缺失信息]均为41篇(1.76%)。前十种期刊中有三种是贸易出版物。美国的安进公司是产出最多的机构,有51篇文献,其次是辉瑞公司,有48篇。与早年的立法、结构、蛋白质、剂量和仿制药等术语相比,近年来发现了关于特定疾病和药物的术语。
生物类似药相关文献的研究产出和发表数量在增加。大多数出版物来自高收入国家。术语使用趋势与该主题的最新技术水平一致,并反映了对在有望从其使用中获益的疾病中使用生物类似药的兴趣。