Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 1;152(10):967-971. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2342.
The issue of the aging physician and when to cease practice has been controversial for many years. There are reports of prominent physicians who practiced after becoming dangerous in old age, but the profession has not demonstrated the ability to prevent this. A mandatory retirement age could be discriminatory and take many competent physicians out of practice and risk a physician shortage. An increasing body of evidence regarding the relationship between physicians' age and performance has led organizations, such as the American College of Surgeons, to revisit this challenge.
Since 1975, the number of practicing physicians older than 65 years in the United States has increased by more than 374%, and in 2015, 23% of practicing physicians were 65 years or older. Research shows that between ages 40 and 75 years, the mean cognitive ability declines by more than 20%, but there is significant variability from one person to another, indicating that while some older physicians are profoundly impaired, others retain their ability and skills. There are age-based requirements for periodic testing and/or retirement for many professions including pilots, judges, air traffic controllers, Federal Bureau of Investigation employees, and firefighters. While there are not similar requirements for physicians, a few hospitals have introduced mandatory age-based evaluations.
As physicians age, a required cognitive evaluation combined with a confidential, anonymous feedback evaluation by peers and coworkers regarding wellness and competence would be beneficial both to physicians and their patients. While it is unlikely that this will become a national standard soon, individual health care organizations could develop policies similar to those present at a few US institutions. In addition, large professional organizations should identify a range of acceptable policies to address the aging physician while leaving institutions flexibility to customize the approach. Absent robust professional initiatives in this area, regulators and legislators may impose more draconian measures.
多年来,关于老年医生以及何时停止行医的问题一直存在争议。有报道称,一些知名医生在年老体衰后仍继续行医,但医学界尚未找到预防这种情况的方法。设定强制性退休年龄可能存在歧视,许多有能力的医生会因此被迫退休,从而导致医生短缺。越来越多的证据表明,医生的年龄与表现之间存在关联,这促使美国外科医师学会等组织重新审视这一挑战。
自 1975 年以来,美国 65 岁以上执业医生的数量增加了 374%以上,2015 年,65 岁及以上的执业医生占 23%。研究表明,在 40 岁至 75 岁之间,平均认知能力下降超过 20%,但人与人之间存在很大差异,这表明虽然一些老年医生的认知能力严重受损,但其他医生仍保留着他们的能力和技能。飞行员、法官、空中交通管制员、联邦调查局雇员和消防员等许多职业都有基于年龄的定期测试和/或退休要求。虽然医生没有类似的要求,但一些医院已经引入了强制性的基于年龄的评估。
随着医生年龄的增长,对认知能力进行强制性评估,同时对医生的健康状况和能力进行由同行和同事进行的保密、匿名反馈评估,这将对医生和患者都有好处。虽然这不太可能很快成为国家标准,但个别医疗机构可以制定类似于美国少数机构目前所采用的政策。此外,大型专业组织应确定一系列可接受的政策来解决老年医生的问题,同时让医疗机构有灵活度来定制方法。如果该领域没有强有力的专业举措,监管机构和立法者可能会采取更严厉的措施。