• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得性脑损伤患者中哪些人在职业康复后重返工作岗位?快速重返工作队列研究。

Who among patients with acquired brain injury returned to work after occupational rehabilitation? The rapid-return-to-work-cohort-study.

作者信息

Aas Randi Wågø, Haveraaen Lise Aasen, Brouwers Evelien P M, Skarpaas Lisebet Skeie

机构信息

a Presenter - Making Sense of Science , Stavanger , Norway.

b Faculty of Health Sciences , Oslo and Akershus University College for Applied Sciences , Oslo , Norway.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Oct;40(21):2561-2570. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1354234. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2017.1354234
PMID:28724317
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acquired brain injury (ABI) is known to be severely disabling. On average, 40% of employees return to work (RTW) within two years after injury. There is, however, limited research on what might contribute to successful RTW.

AIM

To examine factors that might impact the time-to first RTW for patients with ABI, participating in a RTW-program.

METHODS

The study was designed as a cohort study of patients on sick leave due to mild or moderate ABI (n = 137). The mean age of the patients was 51 years, and 58% were men. The most common diagnoses were stroke (75%) and traumatic brain injury (12%). Data were collected through questionnaires, and combined with register data on sickness absence. Survival analyses were used to analyse the effect of different variables on time to first RTW (full or partial), at one- and two-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Generally, women (HR = 0.447; CI: 0.239-0.283) had higher RTW-rates than men, and patients with non-comorbid impairments returned to work earlier than patients with multiple impairments. Although not statistically significant, receiving individual consultations and participating in group-sessions were generally associated with a delayed RTW at both follow-up-times. The only service-related factor significantly associated with delayed RTW was meetings with the social insurance office (HR = 0.522; CI: 0.282-0.965), and only at one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Women and patients with non-comorbid impairments returned to work earlier than men and patients with multiple impairments. There seems to be an association between intense and long-lasting participation in the RTW program and prolonged time-to first-RTW, even after controlling for level of cognitive impairments and comorbidity. Implications for Rehabilitation Acquired brain injury (ABI) is known to be severely disabling, and persons with ABI often experience difficulties in regard to returning to work. This study provides information on prognostic factors that might contribute to return to work (RTW) for patients with acquired brain injury, both at the individual level, but also in regard to service and timing characteristics. Knowledge about such factors provide rehabilitation professionals with information about effective service components that might help patients with ABI to RTW, and thus makes it possible to adapt and adjust the services to the patient's situation. Furthermore, having more knowledge on factors that contribute to RTW gives clinics the opportunity to select patients that might benefit the most from these services, thereby making them more effective.

摘要

背景

已知获得性脑损伤(ABI)具有严重致残性。平均而言,40%的员工在受伤后两年内重返工作岗位(RTW)。然而,关于哪些因素可能有助于成功重返工作岗位的研究有限。

目的

研究可能影响参与重返工作岗位计划的ABI患者首次重返工作岗位时间的因素。

方法

本研究设计为对因轻度或中度ABI而休病假的患者(n = 137)进行队列研究。患者的平均年龄为51岁,58%为男性。最常见的诊断是中风(75%)和创伤性脑损伤(12%)。通过问卷调查收集数据,并与病假登记数据相结合。采用生存分析来分析不同变量对首次重返工作岗位(全部或部分)时间的影响,随访时间为1年和2年。

结果

总体而言,女性(HR = 0.447;CI:0.239 - 0.283)的重返工作岗位率高于男性,无合并症损伤的患者比有多种损伤的患者更早重返工作岗位。虽然无统计学意义,但在两次随访时,接受个人咨询和参加小组会议通常与重返工作岗位延迟有关。与重返工作岗位延迟显著相关的唯一服务相关因素是与社会保险办公室的会面(HR = 0.522;CI:0.282 - 0.965),且仅在1年随访时。

结论

女性和无合并症损伤的患者比男性和有多种损伤的患者更早重返工作岗位。即使在控制了认知损伤水平和合并症之后,高强度和长期参与重返工作岗位计划与首次重返工作岗位时间延长之间似乎也存在关联。康复启示已知获得性脑损伤(ABI)具有严重致残性,ABI患者在重返工作岗位方面往往存在困难。本研究提供了有关预后因素的信息,这些因素可能有助于获得性脑损伤患者重返工作岗位,无论是在个体层面,还是在服务和时间特征方面。了解这些因素为康复专业人员提供了有关有效服务组成部分的信息,这些信息可能有助于ABI患者重返工作岗位,从而使服务能够根据患者的情况进行调整。此外,更多地了解有助于重返工作岗位的因素使诊所能够选择可能从这些服务中受益最大的患者,从而提高服务效率。

相似文献

1
Who among patients with acquired brain injury returned to work after occupational rehabilitation? The rapid-return-to-work-cohort-study.获得性脑损伤患者中哪些人在职业康复后重返工作岗位?快速重返工作队列研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Oct;40(21):2561-2570. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1354234. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
2
Combined cognitive and vocational interventions after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.轻至中度创伤性脑损伤后的认知与职业联合干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2218-7.
3
Horizontal return to work coordination was more common in RTW programs than the recommended vertical coordination. The Rapid-RTW cohort study.横向重返工作协调在重返工作方案中比建议的垂直协调更为常见。快速重返工作队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 26;19(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4607-y.
4
Indicators of long-term return to work after severe traumatic brain injury: A cohort study.严重创伤性脑损伤后长期重返工作岗位的指标:一项队列研究。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jan;62(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
5
Job demands and decision control predicted return to work: the rapid-RTW cohort study.工作需求和决策控制预测复工情况:快速复工队列研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3942-8.
6
Return to work following acquired brain injury: the views of patients and employers.后天性脑损伤后的重返工作:患者和雇主的观点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(2):185-191. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250118. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Prognostic factors for return to work in patients with sciatica.坐骨神经痛患者重返工作的预后因素。
Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1849-57. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.433. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
The First Six Years of Building and Implementing a Return-to-Work Service for Patients with Acquired Brain Injury. The Rapid-Return-to-Work-Cohort-Study.构建和实施脑外伤患者重返工作岗位服务的头六年。快速重返工作岗位队列研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9693-7.
9
Return to Work after a Stroke in Working Age Persons; A Six-Year Follow Up.工作年龄人群中风后的重返工作;六年随访
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169759. eCollection 2017.
10
Multiple transitions in sick leave, disability benefits, and return to work. - A 4-year follow-up of patients participating in a work-related rehabilitation program.多种病假、残疾福利和重返工作岗位的转变。- 参加工作相关康复计划的患者的 4 年随访。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 6;12:748. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-748.

引用本文的文献

1
Disability and Factors Associated with Disability in the Discharge Transition Phase After Acquired Brain Injury: An Observational Follow-Up Study.后天性脑损伤后出院过渡阶段的残疾及与残疾相关的因素:一项观察性随访研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):1989. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161989.
2
Time from injury and age interact in relationship with perceived quality of life outcomes following vocation-focused neuropsychological rehabilitation.受伤后的时间与年龄相互作用,影响以职业为重点的神经心理康复后所感知到的生活质量结果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1047615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1047615. eCollection 2023.
3
Acquired Brain Injury Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Nationwide Study of Labor Market Attachment.
青少年和青年期获得性脑损伤:劳动力市场联系的全国性研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Sep;33(3):592-601. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10097-4. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Scoping 'sex' and 'gender' in rehabilitation: (mis)representations and effects.范围界定康复中的“性”和“性别”:(错误)表述和影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Dec 16;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01787-1.
5
Promoting labour market inclusion of the chronically ill: a scoping review of Scandinavian countries' efforts.促进慢性病患者融入劳动力市场:斯堪的纳维亚国家努力的范围综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Dec;51(8):1097-1107. doi: 10.1177/14034948221096005. Epub 2022 May 10.
6
Development of a Programme Theory for Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation: A Realist Literature Review.早期干预职业康复计划理论的发展:一个现实主义的文献综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Dec;31(4):730-743. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10000-z. Epub 2021 Sep 15.