Radke Brian R
Plant & Animal Health Branch, Ministry of Agriculture, British Columbia.
Can J Vet Res. 2017 Jul;81(3):235-240.
International comparisons of animal antimicrobial use (AMU) have typically been based on total national estimates of antimicrobials sales standardized by the national animal biomass calculated as the population correction unit (PCU). The objective of this paper was to compare the currently accepted PCU calculation with that of the adjusted population correction unit (APCU), which re-evaluates the standard animal weights used in the calculation and accounts for animal lifespan. The APCU calculation resulted in substantial changes to the 2009 national biomass estimates for cattle, pigs, and poultry in 8 European countries and Canada. The estimated national biomass for cattle increased 35% to 43%, while the estimated national biomass of pigs and poultry typically decreased by approximately 51% and 87%, respectively. Among the 9 countries, the total national APCU ranged from an increase of 1% to a decrease of 40% relative to PCU, and these differences were statistically significant. Adjusted population correction unit is preferred over PCU in comparing and contrasting AMU among animals with different lifespans because it is more transparently derived and is a reasonable approximation of the animal biomass at risk of antimicrobial treatment.
动物抗菌药物使用(AMU)的国际比较通常基于全国抗菌药物销售总量估计值,该估计值通过以种群校正单位(PCU)计算的全国动物生物量进行标准化。本文的目的是将目前公认的PCU计算方法与调整后的种群校正单位(APCU)计算方法进行比较,后者重新评估了计算中使用的标准动物体重,并考虑了动物寿命。APCU计算导致8个欧洲国家和加拿大2009年牛、猪和家禽的全国生物量估计值发生了重大变化。牛的估计全国生物量增加了35%至43%,而猪和家禽的估计全国生物量通常分别下降了约51%和87%。在这9个国家中,相对于PCU,全国APCU总量从增加1%到减少40%不等,且这些差异具有统计学意义。在比较不同寿命动物的AMU时,调整后的种群校正单位比PCU更可取,因为它的推导更透明,并且是接受抗菌治疗风险的动物生物量的合理近似值。