Vlacho Bogdan, Giner-Soriano Maria, Zabaleta-Del-Olmo Edurne, Roso-Llorach Albert, García-Sangenís Ana, Morros-Pedrós Rosa
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Valles, Spain.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;73(10):1323-1330. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2305-4. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the profile of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who start an anticoagulant treatment after diagnosis with dabigatran and compare it with those who start with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
We analysed primary health care-based electronic health records data from 15,075 people with new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation who initiated treatment with dabigatran or VKA spanning 2011-2013. Logistic regression analysis for determination of factors associated with initiation of dabigatran was performed.
We identified 14,266 (94.6%) people who initiated VKA and 809 (5.4%) who initiated dabigatran. Mean age of people treated with dabigatran was lower than in VKA patients (73.7 vs 75.5 years, p < 0.001). People (90.5%) in VKA group and 83.6% in the dabigatran group had a high risk of stroke, according to CHADSVASc score. There was higher proportion of people with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, and chronic kidney disease among people treated with VKA. The proportion of people with a history of cerebral haemorrhage and stroke was higher among dabigatran patients compared with VKA patients (1.4 vs 0.6%, p = 0.015 and 14.0% vs 10.8%, p = 0.006, respectively). Multivariable logistic model showed that treatment with dabigatran was associated with male sex, history of stroke and Mortalidad en áreas pequeñas Españolas y Desigualdades Socioeconómicas index.
Most patients recently diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation initiated treatment with VKA. Primary healthcare patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation initiating dabigatran are younger, had a lower risk of stroke or bleeding, fewer comorbidity and more history of stroke and intracranial haemorrhage compared to those who were initiated on VKA.
本研究旨在描述诊断为非瓣膜性心房颤动后开始使用达比加群进行抗凝治疗的患者特征,并将其与开始使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)的患者进行比较。
我们分析了2011年至2013年期间15075例新诊断为心房颤动并开始使用达比加群或VKA治疗的患者基于初级医疗保健的电子健康记录数据。进行了逻辑回归分析以确定与开始使用达比加群相关的因素。
我们确定了14266例(94.6%)开始使用VKA的患者和809例(5.4%)开始使用达比加群的患者。使用达比加群治疗的患者的平均年龄低于VKA患者(73.7岁对75.5岁,p<0.001)。根据CHADSVASc评分,VKA组90.5%的患者和达比加群组83.6%的患者有高卒中风险。在使用VKA治疗的患者中,高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常和慢性肾脏病患者的比例更高。与VKA患者相比,达比加群患者中有脑出血和卒中病史的患者比例更高(分别为1.4%对0.6%,p=0.015;14.0%对10.8%,p=0.006)。多变量逻辑模型显示,使用达比加群治疗与男性、卒中病史和西班牙小地区死亡率及社会经济不平等指数相关。
大多数最近诊断为非瓣膜性心房颤动的患者开始使用VKA治疗。与开始使用VKA的非瓣膜性心房颤动初级医疗保健患者相比,开始使用达比加群的患者更年轻,卒中或出血风险更低,合并症更少,且有更多的卒中及颅内出血病史。