Liu Yuqiu, Wang Chunjie, Jiang Haibo, He Hongjian, Chen Feiyan
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Bio-X Laboratory, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181007. eCollection 2017.
Previous studies indicate that lying consumes cognitive resources, especially working memory (WM) resources. Considering the dual functions that WM might play in lying: holding the truth-related information and turning the truth into lies, the present study examined the relationship between the information storage and processing in the lie construction. To achieve that goal, a deception task based on the old/new recognition paradigm was designed, which could manipulate two levels of WM load (low-load task using 4 items and high-load task using 6 items) during the deception process. The analyses based on the amplitude of the contralateral delay activity (CDA), a proved index of the number of representations being held in WM, showed that the CDA amplitude was lower in the deception process than that in the truth telling process under the high-load condition. In contrast, under the low-load condition, no CDA difference was found between the deception and truth telling processes. Therefore, we deduced that the lie construction and information storage compete for WM resources; when the available WM resources cannot meet this cognitive demand, the WM resources occupied by the information storage would be consumed by the lie construction.
先前的研究表明,说谎会消耗认知资源,尤其是工作记忆(WM)资源。考虑到工作记忆在说谎中可能发挥的双重作用:保留与真相相关的信息并将真相转化为谎言,本研究考察了谎言构建过程中信息存储与处理之间的关系。为实现这一目标,设计了一个基于新旧识别范式的欺骗任务,该任务可以在欺骗过程中操纵两个水平的工作记忆负荷(使用4个项目的低负荷任务和使用6个项目的高负荷任务)。基于对侧延迟活动(CDA)幅度的分析,CDA是已被证实的反映工作记忆中所保留表象数量的指标,结果显示在高负荷条件下,欺骗过程中的CDA幅度低于说实话过程中的CDA幅度。相反,在低负荷条件下,欺骗过程与说实话过程之间未发现CDA差异。因此,我们推断谎言构建和信息存储会争夺工作记忆资源;当可用的工作记忆资源无法满足这种认知需求时,信息存储所占用的工作记忆资源就会被谎言构建消耗。