• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究欺骗中的社会认知过程:神经影像学研究的定量荟萃分析。

Investigating socio-cognitive processes in deception: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

作者信息

Lisofsky Nina, Kazzer Philipp, Heekeren Hauke R, Prehn Kristin

机构信息

Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Cluster of Excellence "Languages of Emotion," Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.001
PMID:24929201
Abstract

Recent neuroimaging studies have found a broad network of brain regions involved in deception, including the prefrontal cortex, insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and inferior parietal lobule (IPL). Although deception can be conceptualized as the attempt to deliberately cause another person to accept a false belief, research to date has mainly focused on executive control processes when participants are instructed to lie under certain conditions. Recently, more ecologically valid and interactive experimental paradigms have been used in which subjects were also requested to take the perspective of another person, read his or her intentions, and make a self-determined decision to deceive that person and break a moral rule. To investigate the influence of these socio-cognitive processes on the neural network of deception, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis combining the data from 416 participants across 22 fMRI and two PET studies. Based on the description of the experimental paradigm, studies were divided in social interactive and non-interactive deception studies. Increased activation in the dorsal ACC, the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ)/angular gyrus, and the bilateral temporal pole (TP) was found to be greater in social interactive than in non-interactive deception. These results demonstrate the important role of perspective taking, theory of mind, and moral reasoning processes in deception as well as conflict processing. In addition to the role of executive control processes determined by previous meta-analyses, our findings show the importance of these socio-cognitive processes in deception and give new insight into the function and interpretation of the brain regions involved.

摘要

最近的神经影像学研究发现,有一个广泛的脑区网络参与欺骗行为,包括前额叶皮层、脑岛、前扣带回皮层(ACC)和顶下小叶(IPL)。虽然欺骗可以被概念化为故意使他人接受错误信念的企图,但迄今为止的研究主要集中在参与者在特定条件下被指示说谎时的执行控制过程。最近,人们采用了更符合生态效度且具有交互性的实验范式,在这些范式中,受试者还被要求从他人的角度出发,解读其意图,并自主决定欺骗那个人并违反道德规则。为了研究这些社会认知过程对欺骗神经网络的影响,我们进行了一项定量荟萃分析,综合了来自22项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究和两项正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究的416名参与者的数据。根据实验范式的描述,研究被分为社会交互性欺骗研究和非交互性欺骗研究。结果发现,与非交互性欺骗相比,社会交互性欺骗中背侧ACC、右侧颞顶联合区(TPJ)/角回以及双侧颞极(TP)的激活增加更为明显。这些结果证明了在欺骗以及冲突处理过程中,采择视角、心理理论和道德推理过程的重要作用。除了先前荟萃分析所确定的执行控制过程的作用外,我们的研究结果还表明了这些社会认知过程在欺骗中的重要性,并为所涉及脑区的功能和解释提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Investigating socio-cognitive processes in deception: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.探究欺骗中的社会认知过程:神经影像学研究的定量荟萃分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
2
Neural correlates of the judgment of lying: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.说谎判断的神经关联:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neurosci Res. 2009 Jan;63(1):24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
3
Neural foundation of human moral reasoning: an ALE meta-analysis about the role of personal perspective.人类道德推理的神经基础:关于个人视角作用的激活可能性估计元分析
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Feb;11(1):278-292. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9505-x.
4
Neural correlates of forgiveness for moral transgressions involving deception.欺骗相关道德过失的宽恕的神经关联。
Brain Res. 2010 May 21;1332:90-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.045. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
5
Functional Interactions Between Neural Substrates of Socio-cognitive Mechanisms Involved in Simple Deception and Manipulative Truth.涉及简单欺骗和操纵真相的社会认知机制的神经基质的功能相互作用
Brain Connect. 2022 Sep;12(7):639-649. doi: 10.1089/brain.2021.0063. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Possible role of an error detection mechanism in brain processing of deception: PET-fMRI study.可能的错误检测机制在大脑处理欺骗中的作用:PET-fMRI 研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Dec;90(3):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
The cognitive and neural time course of empathy and sympathy: an electrical neuroimaging study on self-other interaction.共情与同情的认知和神经时间进程:一项关于自我与他人互动的神经影像学研究
Neuroscience. 2014 May 16;267:286-306. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.02.024. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
8
The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.道德判断中认知冲突与控制的神经基础。
Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027.
9
Spatio-temporal dynamics of kind versus hostile intentions in the human brain: An electrical neuroimaging study.人类大脑中友善与敌意意图的时空动态:一项脑电成像研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2015;10(3):253-67. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.990641. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Deceiving others: distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions.欺骗他人:前额叶皮层和杏仁核在简单编造及社交互动欺骗中的不同神经反应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Feb;19(2):287-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.287.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurocomputational mechanisms of personal benefits and justifications in moral decision-making.道德决策中个人利益与正当理由的神经计算机制。
Commun Biol. 2025 Jun 10;8(1):906. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08256-9.
2
The neurosociological paradigm of the metaverse.元宇宙的神经社会学范式。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1371876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1371876. eCollection 2024.
3
Distinguishing deception from its confounds by improving the validity of fMRI-based neural prediction.通过提高基于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的神经预测的有效性来区分欺骗与其混淆因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 10;121(50):e2412881121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412881121. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
To lie or to tell the truth? The influence of processing the opponent's feedback on the forthcoming choice.说谎还是说实话?处理对手反馈对即将做出的选择的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 9;15:1275884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1275884. eCollection 2024.
5
An EEG Dataset of Neural Signatures in a Competitive Two-Player Game Encouraging Deceptive Behavior.鼓励欺骗行为的竞争性二人游戏中的神经特征 EEG 数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 Apr 16;11(1):389. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03234-y.
6
Similarities and Distinctions between Cortical Neural Substrates That Underlie Generation of Malevolent Creative Ideas.产生恶意创意的皮质神经基质的相似性和区别。
eNeuro. 2023 Sep 19;10(9). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0127-23.2023. Print 2023 Sep.
7
Exploring offending characteristics of young people with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Western Australia.探索西澳大利亚州患有胎儿酒精谱系障碍的年轻人的犯罪特征。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Jun 13;30(4):514-535. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2059028. eCollection 2023.
8
Reputation risk during dishonest social decision-making modulates anterior insular and cingulate cortex activity and connectivity.不诚实的社会决策过程中的声誉风险会调节前脑岛和扣带皮层的活动和连通性。
Commun Biol. 2023 Apr 29;6(1):475. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04827-w.
9
Why people engage in corrupt collaboration: an observation at the multi-brain level.为什么人们会从事腐败合作:多脑水平的观察。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 20;33(13):8465-8476. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad132.
10
Non-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and theory of mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach.非字面语言处理由语言和心理理论网络共同支持:来自一种新颖的元分析 fMRI 方法的证据。
Cortex. 2023 May;162:96-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.013. Epub 2023 Mar 9.