Ragazzoni Aldo, Cincotta Massimo, Giovannelli Fabio, Cruse Damian, Young G Bryan, Miniussi Carlo, Rossi Simone
Unit of Neurology & Clinical Neurophysiology, Fondazione PAS, Scandicci, Florence, Italy.
S.C. Neurologìa Firenze, AUSL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1629-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
The identification of signs of awareness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe brain injury is a challenging task for clinicians. Differentiating on behavioural examination the vegetative state (VS) from the minimally conscious state (MCS) can lead to a high misdiagnosis rate. Advanced neuroimaging and neurophysiological techniques can supplement clinical evaluation by providing physiological evidence of brain activity. However, an open issue remains whether these empirical results are directly or indirectly associated with covert consciousness and limitations emerge for their diagnostic application at the single-patient level. On the therapeutic side, the efficacy of both non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation/modulation trials is matter of debate. The present review provides an updated analysis of the diagnostic and prognostic impact that the different neurophysiological techniques of stimulation [including short-latency evoked potentials, long-latency event related potentials (ERPs), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), TMS-EEG co-registration] offer in prolonged DoC. The results of the therapeutic stimulation techniques are also evaluated. It is concluded that TMS-EEG emerges as the most promising tool for differentiating VS from MCS whereas ERPs allow neurophysiologists to probe covert cognitive capacities of each patient. Significant behavioural improvements in prolonged DoC with brain stimulation techniques are still anecdotical and further treatment options are awaited.
对于临床医生而言,识别重度脑损伤后长期意识障碍(DoC)患者的意识迹象是一项具有挑战性的任务。通过行为检查区分植物状态(VS)和最低意识状态(MCS)会导致较高的误诊率。先进的神经影像学和神经生理学技术可通过提供脑活动的生理证据来补充临床评估。然而,一个悬而未决的问题是,这些实证结果与隐蔽意识是直接还是间接相关,并且在单患者层面其诊断应用存在局限性。在治疗方面,非侵入性和侵入性脑刺激/调制试验的疗效仍存在争议。本综述对不同神经生理学刺激技术[包括短潜伏期诱发电位、长潜伏期事件相关电位(ERP)、经颅磁刺激(TMS)、TMS-EEG联合记录]在长期DoC中所提供的诊断和预后影响进行了更新分析。还评估了治疗性刺激技术的结果。得出的结论是,TMS-EEG是区分VS和MCS最有前景的工具,而ERP使神经生理学家能够探究每个患者的隐蔽认知能力。脑刺激技术在长期DoC中带来的显著行为改善仍属个案报道,有待进一步的治疗选择。