Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Rural Health. 2018 Mar;34(2):122-131. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12259. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
To evaluate the difference in tubal ligation use between rural and urban counties in the state of Georgia, USA.
The study population included 2,160 women aged 22-45. All participants completed a detailed interview on their reproductive histories. County of residence was categorized using the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We estimated the association between urbanization of county of residence and tubal ligation using Cox regression. Among women with a tubal ligation, we examined factors associated with prior contraception use and the desire for more children.
After adjustment for covariates, women residing in rural counties had twice the incidence rate of tubal ligation compared with women in large metropolitan counties (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.4-2.9) and were on average 3 years younger at the time of the procedure. No differences were observed between small metropolitan and large metropolitan counties (aHR = 1.1, CI = 0.9-1.5). Our data suggest that women from large metropolitan counties are slightly more likely than women from rural counties to use hormonal contraception or long-acting reversible contraception prior to tubal ligation and to desire more children after tubal ligation.
Women from rural counties are more likely to undergo a tubal ligation than their urban counterparts. Our results suggest that circumstances regarding opting for tubal ligation may differ between urban and rural areas, and recommendations of alternative contraceptive options may need to be tailored differently for rural areas.
评估美国佐治亚州农村和城市县之间输卵管结扎使用的差异。
研究人群包括 2160 名年龄在 22-45 岁的女性。所有参与者都完成了关于其生育史的详细访谈。根据国家卫生统计中心的城乡分类方案对居住县进行分类。我们使用 Cox 回归估计居住地城市化与输卵管结扎之间的关联。在进行输卵管结扎的女性中,我们检查了与先前使用避孕措施和希望生育更多孩子相关的因素。
在调整了协变量后,与居住在大型都会县的女性相比,居住在农村县的女性输卵管结扎的发生率增加了一倍(调整后的危险比[aHR] = 2.0,95%CI = 1.4-2.9),并且在手术时平均年轻 3 岁。在小型都会县和大型都会县之间没有观察到差异(aHR = 1.1,CI = 0.9-1.5)。我们的数据表明,来自大型都会县的女性比来自农村县的女性更有可能在进行输卵管结扎前使用激素避孕或长效可逆避孕,并且在进行输卵管结扎后更希望生育更多孩子。
农村县的女性比城市县的女性更有可能进行输卵管结扎。我们的结果表明,在选择输卵管结扎方面,城乡之间的情况可能有所不同,因此需要为农村地区量身定制不同的替代避孕措施建议。