Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University , DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Natural Sciences, Bogdan Khmelnitsky National University , Cherkassy 18031, Ukraine.
Acc Chem Res. 2017 Aug 15;50(8):1920-1927. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00169. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Singlet oxygen, O(aΔ), the lowest excited electronic state of molecular oxygen, is an omnipresent part of life on earth. It is readily formed through a variety of chemical and photochemical processes, and its unique reactions are important not just as a tool in chemical syntheses but also in processes that range from polymer degradation to signaling in biological cells. For these reasons, O(aΔ) has been the subject of intense activity in a broad distribution of scientific fields for the past ∼50 years. The characteristic reactions of O(aΔ) kinetically compete with processes that deactivate this excited state to the ground state of oxygen, O(XΣ). Moreover, O(aΔ) is ideally monitored using one of these deactivation channels: O(aΔ) → O(XΣ) phosphorescence at 1270 nm. Thus, there is ample justification to study and control these competing processes, including those mediated by solvents, and the chemistry community has likewise actively tackled this issue. In themselves, the solvent-mediated radiative and nonradiative transitions between the three lowest-lying electronic states of oxygen [O(XΣ), O(aΔ), and O(bΣ)] are relevant to issues at the core of modern chemistry. In the isolated oxygen molecule, these transitions are forbidden by quantum-mechanical selection rules. However, solvent molecules perturb oxygen in such a way as to make these transitions more probable. Most interestingly, the effect of a series of solvents on the O(XΣ)-O(bΣ) transition, for example, can be totally different from the effect of the same series of solvents on the O(XΣ)-O(aΔ) transition. Moreover, a given solvent that appreciably increases the probability of a radiative transition generally does not provide a correspondingly viable pathway for nonradiative energy loss, and vice versa. The ∼50 years of experimental work leading to these conclusions were not easy; spectroscopically monitoring such weak and low-energy transitions in time-resolved experiments is challenging. Consequently, results obtained from different laboratories often were not consistent. In turn, attempts to interpret molecular events were often simplistic and/or misguided. However, over the recent past, increasingly accurate experiments have converged on a base of credible data, finally forming a consistent picture of this system that is resonant with theoretical models. The concepts involved encompass a large fraction of chemistry's fundamental lexicon, e.g., spin-orbit coupling, state mixing, quantum tunneling, electronic-to-vibrational energy transfer, activation barriers, collision complexes, and charge-transfer interactions. In this Account, we provide an explanatory overview of the ways in which a given solvent will perturb the radiative and nonradiative transitions between the O(XΣ), O(aΔ), and O(bΣ) states.
单线态氧,O(aΔ),是分子氧的最低激发电子态,是地球上生命无处不在的一部分。它可以通过各种化学和光化学过程轻易地形成,其独特的反应不仅是化学合成的工具,而且在聚合物降解到生物细胞信号传递等过程中也很重要。出于这些原因,O(aΔ)在过去的大约 50 年中一直是广泛的科学领域的热门研究课题。O(aΔ)的特征反应在动力学上与使这种激发态失活到氧的基态 O(XΣ)的过程竞争。此外,O(aΔ)理想情况下可以通过其中一种失活通道进行监测:1270nm 处的 O(aΔ)→O(XΣ)磷光。因此,有充分的理由研究和控制这些竞争过程,包括由溶剂介导的过程,化学界也积极地解决了这个问题。本身而言,溶剂介导的氧的三个最低电子态[O(XΣ)、O(aΔ)和 O(bΣ)]之间的辐射和非辐射跃迁对现代化学的核心问题至关重要。在孤立的氧分子中,这些跃迁受到量子力学选择规则的禁止。然而,溶剂分子以一种使这些跃迁更有可能发生的方式干扰氧。最有趣的是,例如,一系列溶剂对 O(XΣ)-O(bΣ)跃迁的影响可能与同一系列溶剂对 O(XΣ)-O(aΔ)跃迁的影响完全不同。此外,大大增加辐射跃迁概率的给定溶剂通常不会为非辐射能量损失提供相应可行的途径,反之亦然。导致这些结论的约 50 年的实验工作并不容易;在时间分辨实验中,光谱监测这种弱的低能量跃迁是具有挑战性的。因此,来自不同实验室的结果通常不一致。反过来,对分子事件的解释往往是简单的和/或有误导性的。然而,在最近的过去,越来越精确的实验已经汇聚在一个可信数据的基础上,最终形成了一个与理论模型相吻合的该系统的一致图景。所涉及的概念涵盖了化学基础词汇的很大一部分,例如,自旋轨道耦合、态混合、量子隧道、电子-振动能量转移、激活势垒、碰撞复合物和电荷转移相互作用。在本专题中,我们提供了一个解释性概述,说明给定的溶剂将如何干扰 O(XΣ)、O(aΔ)和 O(bΣ)态之间的辐射和非辐射跃迁。