Suppr超能文献

葡萄茎用于通过吸附去除咖啡因

Grape stalk application for caffeine removal through adsorption.

作者信息

Portinho Rodrigo, Zanella Odivan, Féris Liliana Amaral

机构信息

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Department of Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Separation and Unity Operation (LASOP), R. Eng. Luis Englert, s/n. Campus Central, CEP: 90040-040, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, Laboratory of Separation Process, Rodovia RS 135, Km 25, CEP: 99170-000, Distrito Eng. Luiz Englert, Sertão, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2017 Nov 1;202(Pt 1):178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.033.

Abstract

Concern over emerging pollutants presence in water resources is growing, justifying the search for alternative or additional techniques to those applied in conventional water treatment processes. Use of adsorption with agricultural wastes directly as adsorbents or as precursors for activated carbon synthesis is a viable method, combining removal efficiency, low cost and biodegradability of the material applied. This study investigated the employability of grape stalk, a waste from grape industrialization process without effective use, in caffeine removal from aqueous solution. Grape stalk was used in three different forms: raw with only grain size adjustment (GS), modified by phosphoric acid action (MGS) and as activated carbon (GSAC). In the first two cases parameters pH, residence time and adsorbent concentration were varied in order to find optimum batch process conditions. For GSAC, on the other hand, caffeine removal percentages were high even for the least amount of adsorbent that could be measured with acceptable accuracy, which did not justify concentration parameter variation. Better adsorption capacities were observed in acidic solutions, with optimum pH values being considered as 2.0 for GS and MGS and 4.0 for GSAC. Optimum residence time and adsorbent concentration were 40 min and 25 g L (GS), 30 min and 15 g L (MGS) and 30 min (GSAC). Moreover, equilibrium was evaluated through adsorption isotherms construction, which were best represented by Sips model, displaying determination coefficients R equal to 0.994, 0.999 and 0.987 and maximum adsorption capacities equal to 89.2, 129.6 and 916.7 mg g. Adsorbents particular characteristics such as specific surface areas and micropore volumes were also determined, resulting in 6.23, 4.21 and 1099.86 m g and 0.003, 0.002 and 0.568 cm g for GS, MGS and GSAC, respectively.

摘要

对水资源中新兴污染物存在情况的担忧日益增加,这使得人们有必要寻找除传统水处理工艺中所应用技术之外的替代技术或额外技术。直接使用农业废弃物作为吸附剂或作为活性炭合成前驱体的吸附法是一种可行的方法,该方法兼具去除效率、低成本以及所应用材料的生物降解性等优点。本研究调查了葡萄茎(葡萄产业化过程中产生的一种未得到有效利用的废弃物)从水溶液中去除咖啡因的适用性。葡萄茎以三种不同形式使用:仅调整粒度的原样(GS)、经磷酸处理改性的(MGS)以及作为活性炭(GSAC)。在前两种情况下,改变pH值、停留时间和吸附剂浓度等参数,以找到最佳的间歇式工艺条件。另一方面,对于GSAC,即使对于能够以可接受的精度测量的最少吸附剂用量,咖啡因去除率也很高,这使得改变浓度参数没有意义。在酸性溶液中观察到更好的吸附容量,GS和MGS的最佳pH值为2.0,GSAC的最佳pH值为4.0。最佳停留时间和吸附剂浓度分别为40分钟和25 g/L(GS)、30分钟和15 g/L(MGS)以及30分钟(GSAC)。此外,通过构建吸附等温线来评估平衡,吸附等温线最适合用Sips模型表示,其决定系数R分别等于0.994、0.999和0.987,最大吸附容量分别等于89.2、129.6和916.7 mg/g。还测定了吸附剂的特定特性,如比表面积和微孔体积,GS、MGS和GSAC的比表面积分别为6.23、4.21和1099.86 m²/g,微孔体积分别为0.003、0.002和0.568 cm³/g。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验