Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1353-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.069. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
We performed a network meta-analysis of available randomized, controlled trials to elucidate the risks of urinary tract infection associated with transurethral catheterization, suprapubic tubes and intermittent catheterization in the postoperative setting.
PubMed®, EMBASE® and Google Scholar™ searches were performed for eligible randomized, controlled trials from January 1980 to July 2015 that included patients who underwent transurethral catheterization, suprapubic tube placement or intermittent catheterization at the time of surgery and catheterization lasting up to postoperative day 30. The primary outcome of comparison was the urinary tract infection rate via a network meta-analysis with random effects model using the netmeta package in R 3.2 (www.r-project.org/).
Included in analysis were 14 randomized, controlled trials in a total of 1,391 patients. Intermittent catheterization and suprapubic tubes showed no evidence of decreased urinary tract infection rates compared to transurethral catheterization. Suprapubic tubes and intermittent catheterization had comparable urinary tract infection rates (OR 0.903, 95% CI 0.479-2.555). On subgroup analysis of 10 randomized, controlled trials with available mean catheterization duration data in a total of 928 patients intermittent catheterization and suprapubic tube were associated with significantly decreased risk of urinary tract infection compared to transurethral catheterization when catheterization duration was greater than 5 days (OR 0.173, 95% CI 0.073-0.412 and OR 0.142, 95% CI 0.073-0.276, respectively).
Transurethral catheterization is not associated with an increased urinary tract infection risk compared to suprapubic tubes and intermittent catheterization if catheterization duration is 5 days or less. However, a suprapubic tube or intermittent catheterization is associated with a lower rate of urinary tract infection if longer term catheterization is expected in the postoperative period.
我们进行了一项网络荟萃分析,以阐明在术后环境中经尿道导尿、耻骨上管和间歇性导尿与尿路感染风险之间的关系。我们检索了 1980 年 1 月至 2015 年 7 月期间的随机对照试验,这些试验纳入了在手术时接受经尿道导尿、耻骨上管置管或间歇性导尿且导尿管留置时间不超过术后 30 天的患者。使用 R 3.2(www.r-project.org/)中的 netmeta 包进行随机效应模型的网络荟萃分析,比较主要结局为尿路感染率。
我们检索了 PubMed®、EMBASE®和 Google Scholar™,纳入了 14 项随机对照试验,共纳入 1391 例患者。与经尿道导尿相比,间歇性导尿和耻骨上管并没有降低尿路感染率的证据。与经尿道导尿相比,耻骨上管和间歇性导尿的尿路感染率相当(OR 0.903,95% CI 0.479-2.555)。在 10 项随机对照试验的亚组分析中,这些试验共纳入了 928 例患者,其中有可获得的平均导尿持续时间数据,与经尿道导尿相比,当导尿持续时间大于 5 天时,间歇性导尿和耻骨上管与尿路感染风险显著降低(OR 0.173,95% CI 0.073-0.412 和 OR 0.142,95% CI 0.073-0.276)。
与经尿道导尿相比,在导尿持续时间为 5 天或更短的情况下,耻骨上管和间歇性导尿不会增加尿路感染风险。然而,如果术后预期需要长期导尿,则耻骨上管或间歇性导尿与尿路感染发生率较低相关。