• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种玻璃纤维桩粘结技术的比较。

Comparison between three glass fiber post cementation techniques.

作者信息

Migliau Guido, Piccoli Luca, Di Carlo Stefano, Pompa Giorgio, Besharat Laith Konstantinos, Dolci Marco

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):29-33. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.029. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.029
PMID:28736604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5507164/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this experimental study was to compare the traditional cement systems with those of the latest generation, to assess if indeed these could represent of viable substitutes in the cementation of indirect restorations, and in the specific case of endodontic posts.

METHODS

The assessment of the validity of the cementing methods was performed according to the test of the push-out, conducted on sections obtained from the roots of treated teeth. The samples were divided into three groups. Group A (10 samples): etching for 30 seconds with 37% orthophosphoric acid (Superlux-Thixo-etch-DMG) combined with a dual-curing adhesive system (LuxaBond-Total Etch-DMG), dual-cured resin-composite cement (LuxaCore-DMG) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). Group B (10 samples): self-adhesive resin cement (Breeze-Pentron Clinical) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). Group C (10 samples): 3 steps light-curing, self-etching, self-conditioning bonding agent (Contax-Total-etch-DMG), dual-cured resin-composite cement (LuxaCore-DMG) and glass fiber posts (LuxaPost-DMG). The survey was conducted by examining the breaking resistance of the post-cement-tooth complex, subjected to a mechanical force. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Inc. ver. 13.0, Chicago, IL, USA.

RESULTS

Group A values of bond strenth ranged from a minimum of 10.14 Mpa to a maximum value of 14.73 Mpa with a mean value of 12.58 Mpa. In Group B the highest value of bond strength was 6.54 Mpa and the minimum 5.55 Mpa. The mean value of the bond strength for the entire group was 6.58 Mpa. In Group C the highest bond strength was 6.59 Mpa whereas the lowest bond strength was 4.84 Mpa. Mean value of the bond strength of Group C was calculated at 5.7 Mpa.

CONCLUSIONS

Etching with orthophosphoric acid combined with a dual-curing adhesive system and a dual-cured resin-composite cement was the technique that guaranteed the highest bond strength. Lowest bond strength values were obtained when dual self-adhesive cement was used.

摘要

目的

本实验研究旨在比较传统粘结剂系统与最新一代粘结剂系统,评估其是否真的能成为间接修复体粘结,尤其是牙髓根管桩粘结的可行替代材料。

方法

根据推出试验评估粘结方法的有效性,该试验在处理过的牙齿根部切片上进行。样本分为三组。A组(10个样本):用37%正磷酸(Superlux-Thixo-etch-DMG)蚀刻30秒,结合双固化粘结剂系统(LuxaBond-Total Etch-DMG)、双固化树脂复合粘结剂(LuxaCore-DMG)和玻璃纤维桩(LuxaPost-DMG)。B组(10个样本):自粘结树脂粘结剂(Breeze-Pentron Clinical)和玻璃纤维桩(LuxaPost-DMG)。C组(10个样本):三步光固化、自酸蚀、自调节粘结剂(Contax-Total-etch-DMG)、双固化树脂复合粘结剂(LuxaCore-DMG)和玻璃纤维桩(LuxaPost-DMG)。通过检测桩-粘结剂-牙齿复合体在机械力作用下的抗断裂能力进行研究。使用美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市SPSS公司的13.0版软件进行统计分析。

结果

A组粘结强度值范围为最小值10.14兆帕至最大值14.73兆帕,平均值为12.58兆帕。B组粘结强度最高值为6.54兆帕,最低值为5.55兆帕。该组粘结强度平均值为6.58兆帕。C组粘结强度最高值为6.59兆帕,最低值为4.84兆帕。C组粘结强度平均值计算为5.7兆帕。

结论

用正磷酸蚀刻结合双固化粘结剂系统和双固化树脂复合粘结剂是保证最高粘结强度的技术。使用双自粘结粘结剂时获得的粘结强度值最低。

相似文献

1
Comparison between three glass fiber post cementation techniques.三种玻璃纤维桩粘结技术的比较。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):29-33. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.029. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
2
Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post.树脂水门汀系统和根管区域对半透明纤维桩推出粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):80-6. doi: 10.2341/11-035-L. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
3
Comparative evaluation of the regional micro-push-out bond strength of custom-made resin post system with a prefabricated resin post: an in vitro study.定制树脂桩系统与预成树脂桩区域微推出粘结强度的比较评价:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Jul-Aug;23(4):484-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.104954.
4
Effect of Laser Etching on Glass Fiber Posts Cemented with Different Adhesive Systems.激光蚀刻对采用不同粘结系统粘结的玻璃纤维桩的影响。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Jan;36(1):51-57. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4304. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Influence of the Resin Cement Thickness on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts.树脂水门汀厚度对玻璃纤维桩推出粘结强度的影响
Braz Dent J. 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):592-598. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600886.
6
[Effect of different bonding procedure and root region on bond strength of fiber posts to root canal].[不同粘结程序和根管区域对纤维桩与根管粘结强度的影响]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2014 Jun;23(3):294-9.
7
Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.不同黏固剂黏固玻璃纤维桩的推出强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60353-4.
8
Influence of adhesive cementation systems on the bond strength of relined fiber posts to root dentin.黏结剂系统对纤维桩核重新黏固于牙本质的黏结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Oct;118(4):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems.牙根牙本质与三种玻璃纤维桩系统之间的粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jul;96(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.005.
10
Effect of post translucency on bond strength of different resin luting agents to root dentin.不同树脂水门汀对牙本质半透明区后粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary Concepts of Adhesive Cementation of Glass-Fiber Posts: A Narrative Review.玻璃纤维桩粘结固位的当代概念:一篇叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 14;13(12):3479. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123479.
2
Bond Strength and Failure Mode of Glass Fiber Posts with Different Surface Treatments Prior to Silanization: An Comparative Study.硅烷化处理前不同表面处理的玻璃纤维桩的粘结强度和失效模式:一项比较研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Nov 7;13(1):42-53. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_292_21. eCollection 2023 Jan-Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmarking matching color in composite restorations.复合树脂修复体中基准匹配颜色
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2016 Jul 19;7(1-2):29-37. doi: 10.11138/ads/2016.7.1.029. eCollection 2016 Jan-Jun.
2
Endo-restorative treatment of a severly discolored upper incisor: resolution of the "aesthetic" problem through Componeer veneering System.严重变色上颌切牙的牙髓修复治疗:通过Componeer贴面系统解决“美学”问题
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2016 Feb 12;6(3-4):113-8. doi: 10.11138/ads/2015.6.3.113. eCollection 2015 Jul-Dec.
3
A tooth preparation technique in fixed prosthodontics for students and neophyte dentists.一种面向学生和初出茅庐牙医的固定修复学中的牙体预备技术。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2016 Feb 12;6(3-4):104-9. doi: 10.11138/ads/2015.6.3.104. eCollection 2015 Jul-Dec.
4
Push-Out Bond Strength Evaluation of Glass Fiber Posts With Different Resin Cements and Application Techniques.不同树脂水门汀和应用技术的玻璃纤维桩推出强度评估。
Oper Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;41(1):103-10. doi: 10.2341/14-343-L. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
5
Evaluation of over-etching technique in the endodontically treated tooth restoration.根管治疗后牙齿修复中过度酸蚀技术的评估。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2015 May 18;6(1):10-4. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.
6
Influence of different etching times on dentin surface morphology.不同蚀刻时间对牙本质表面形态的影响。
Coll Antropol. 2008 Sep;32(3):893-900.
7
Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts.纤维桩临床性能的长期回顾性研究
Am J Dent. 2007 Oct;20(5):287-91.
8
Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature--Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations.牙髓治疗后牙齿修复的生物力学考量:文献系统综述——第1部分。组成及微观和宏观结构改变
Quintessence Int. 2007 Oct;38(9):733-43.
9
The effect of dowel space on the bond strengths of fiber posts.桩道空间对纤维桩粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2007 May-Jun;16(3):154-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00166.x.
10
Post design and its impact on the root and crown.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2006 Feb;27(2):130-3.