Zhao Kai, Wang Feng, Huang Wei, Wang XuDong, Wu Yiqun
Graduate Student, Department of Oral Implantology and Department of Oral Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Implantology and Department of Oral Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;75(10):2099-2114. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the performance of implants placed after alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) or autogenous onlay bone grafting (AOBG) based on implant survival, peri-implant bone resorption, and clinical parameters.
From February 2008 to July 2012, 17 patients (6 women and 11 men) with implant placement after ADO (group 1, n = 8) or AOBG (group 2, n = 9) were included in this retrospective study. In all, 37 implants were placed in group 1 and 22 implants were placed in group 2. Implant survival rate, peri-implant bone resorption, probe depth (PD), modified plaque index (mPI), and modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) were analyzed to evaluate implant prognosis.
Successful reconstruction of vertical alveolar defects and uneventful implant placement were achieved in all patients in the 2 groups. After a mean follow-up of 47.9 ± 13.3 months, implant survival was 97.3% (36 of 37) in group 1 and 95.5% (21 of 22) in group 2. No statistically relevant differences were observed. Peri-implant bone resorption was 1.29 ± 0.59 mm in group 1, which was slightly higher than 1.24 ± 0.87 mm in group 2 at last follow-up. The difference was not statistically relevant. Favorable peri-implant conditions were indicated by PD, mPI, and mSBI in the 2 groups.
ADO and AOBG can be used for correction of vertical alveolar defects with a reliable implant prognosis. Comparably high implant survival rates and favorable peri-implant conditions were attained.
本回顾性研究的目的是基于种植体存留率、种植体周围骨吸收及临床参数,比较在牙槽骨牵张成骨术(ADO)或自体块状骨移植术(AOBG)后植入种植体的效果。
2008年2月至2012年7月,本回顾性研究纳入了17例在ADO(第1组,n = 8)或AOBG(第2组,n = 9)后植入种植体的患者(6例女性和11例男性)。第1组共植入37枚种植体,第2组共植入22枚种植体。分析种植体存留率、种植体周围骨吸收、探诊深度(PD)、改良菌斑指数(mPI)和改良龈沟出血指数(mSBI)以评估种植体预后。
两组所有患者均成功重建垂直牙槽骨缺损且种植体植入顺利。平均随访47.9±13.3个月后,第1组种植体存留率为97.3%(37枚中的36枚),第2组为95.5%(22枚中的21枚)。未观察到统计学上的显著差异。最后一次随访时,第1组种植体周围骨吸收为1.29±0.59 mm,略高于第2组的1.24±0.87 mm。差异无统计学意义。两组的PD、mPI和mSBI均显示种植体周围状况良好。
ADO和AOBG可用于矫正垂直牙槽骨缺损,种植体预后可靠。获得了相当高的种植体存留率和良好的种植体周围状况。