Burke Dearbhla, Fullen Brona M, Lennon Olive
a UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Health Sciences Centre , University College Dublin , Belfield , Dublin 4, Ireland.
b UCD Centre for Translational Pain Research , University College Dublin , Belfield , Dublin 4. Ireland.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Mar;42(2):201-211. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1351051. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
While as many as 60% of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) develop chronic pain, limited data currently exists on the prevalence and profile of pain post-SCI in community dwelling populations.
A cross-sectional population survey.
Primary care.
Community dwelling adults with SCI.
Following ethical approval members registered to a national SCI database (n=1,574) were surveyed. The survey included demographic and SCI characteristics items, the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (version 1) the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (interview) and questions relating to health care utilisation. Data were entered into the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 20) Significance was set P < 0.05 for between group comparisons.
In total 643 (41%) surveys were returned with 458 (71%) respondents experiencing pain in the previous week. Neuropathic pain (NP) was indicated in 236 (37%) of responses and nociceptive pain in 206 (32%) Common treatments for pain included medications n=347 (76%) massage n=133 (29%) and heat n=115 (25%). Respondents with NP reported higher pain intensities and increased healthcare service utilisation (P= < 0.001) when compared to those with nociceptive pain presentations. A higher proportion of females than males reported pain (P = 0.003) and NP (P = 0.001) and those unemployed presented with greater NP profiles compared with those in education or employment (P = 0.006).
Pain, in particular NP post SCI interferes with daily life, increases health service utilisation and remains refractory to current management strategies. Increased availability of multi-disciplinary pain management and further research into management strategies is warranted.
多达60%的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者会出现慢性疼痛,但目前关于社区居住人群脊髓损伤后疼痛的患病率和特征的数据有限。
一项横断面人群调查。
初级保健机构。
社区居住的脊髓损伤成年患者。
在获得伦理批准后,对注册到国家脊髓损伤数据库的成员(n = 1574)进行了调查。该调查包括人口统计学和脊髓损伤特征项目、国际脊髓损伤疼痛基础数据集(第1版)、神经病理性疼痛4问卷(访谈)以及与医疗保健利用相关的问题。数据录入社会科学统计软件包(第20版)。组间比较的显著性设定为P < 0.05。
共收回643份(41%)调查问卷,458名(71%)受访者在过去一周经历过疼痛。236份(37%)回复表明存在神经性疼痛(NP),206份(32%)存在伤害性疼痛。常见的疼痛治疗方法包括药物治疗(n = 347,76%)、按摩(n = 133,29%)和热敷(n = 115,25%)。与有伤害性疼痛表现的受访者相比,患有神经性疼痛的受访者报告的疼痛强度更高,医疗服务利用率更高(P < 0.001)。报告疼痛(P = 0.003)和神经性疼痛(P = 0.001)的女性比例高于男性,与受教育或就业者相比,失业者的神经性疼痛情况更严重(P = 0.006)。
疼痛,尤其是脊髓损伤后的神经性疼痛,会干扰日常生活,增加医疗服务利用率,并且对当前的管理策略仍然无效。有必要增加多学科疼痛管理的可及性,并进一步研究管理策略。