Contemori Carla, Carlson Matthew, Marinis Theodoros
Department of Languages and Linguistics,University of Texas,El Paso.
Department of Spanish,Italian and Portuguese,Pennsylvania State University and Center for Language Sciences, Pennsylvania State University.
J Child Lang. 2018 Mar;45(2):415-441. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000277. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
Previous research has shown that children demonstrate similar sentence processing reflexes to those observed in adults, but they have difficulties revising an erroneous initial interpretation when they process garden-path sentences, passives, and wh-questions. We used the visual-world paradigm to examine children's use of syntactic and non-syntactic information to resolve syntactic ambiguity by extending our understanding of number features as a cue for interpretation to which-subject and which-object questions. We compared children's and adults' eye-movements to understand how this information shapes children's commitment to and revision of possible interpretations of these questions. The results showed that English-speaking adults and children both exhibit an initial preference to interpret an object-which question as a subject question. While adults quickly override this preference, children take significantly longer, showing an overall processing difficulty for object questions. Crucially, their recovery from an initially erroneous interpretation is speeded when disambiguating number agreement features are present.
先前的研究表明,儿童在句子处理反射方面与成年人表现出相似之处,但在处理花园小径句、被动句和wh疑问句时,他们在修正错误的初始解释方面存在困难。我们使用视觉世界范式,通过将我们对数量特征作为一种解释线索的理解扩展到“which-主语”和“which-宾语”问题,来研究儿童如何利用句法和非句法信息来解决句法歧义。我们比较了儿童和成年人的眼动情况,以了解这些信息如何影响儿童对这些问题可能解释的确定和修正。结果表明,说英语的成年人和儿童最初都倾向于将“which-宾语”问题解释为主语问题。虽然成年人很快就会克服这种偏好,但儿童需要更长的时间,这表明他们在处理宾语问题时总体上存在困难。至关重要的是,当存在消除歧义的数一致特征时,他们从最初错误解释中的恢复速度会加快。