Sayed Ashraf Othman, Zeidan Nancy Selim, Fahmy Dalia Monir, Ibrahim Hossam A
Department of Pediatrics, Children and Women's University Hospital, Minia University, El-Minya, Egypt.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Jul 6;13:847-854. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S134153. eCollection 2017.
Diagnosis of appendicitis in children is clinically challenging. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for diagnosis; however, radiation exposure early in life is a concern with this technique. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic reliability of low-dose CT, pediatric appendicitis score (PAS), and abdominal ultrasound (US) in children with acute appendicitis, to reach a safe diagnosis.
This retrospective study was conducted on 140 children who were admitted with clinically suspected acute appendicitis (45 with positive appendicitis and 95 children with negative appendicitis). Low-dose CT was performed, and PAS was retrospectively calculated for all subjects. US was initially performed for 38 subjects. All results were compared with the final diagnosis reached by an operative, histopathological analysis and follow-up.
Low-dose CT showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.8%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively. At a cutoff value ≥5, PAS showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 95%, 84%, and 89%, respectively. Abdominal US examination showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 55.6%, 85%, and 71%, respectively. Implementing Poortman's model resulted in higher accuracy (92%) of US. There was a significant difference in accuracy between a low-dose CT and PAS on one side and between Poortman's model and US examination on the other side. A diagnostic scheme was suggested using PAS as the excluding tool (PAS ≤2 send home and ≥7 send directly to operation) followed by US examination and reserving low-dose CT for inconclusive cases. This scheme would eliminate the use of CT for at least 33.7% and in 7 cases who had initial US examination.
Although CT remains the most accurate and less operator-dependent diagnostic tool for pediatric appendicitis, the radiation hazards could however be minimized using PAS as an excluding tool and US as the primary imaging modality followed by low-dose CT for inconclusive cases only.
儿童阑尾炎的诊断在临床上具有挑战性。计算机断层扫描(CT)是诊断的金标准;然而,儿童早期接受CT检查会受到辐射,这是人们所担心的问题。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在评估低剂量CT、儿童阑尾炎评分(PAS)和腹部超声(US)对急性阑尾炎患儿的诊断可靠性,以实现安全诊断。
本回顾性研究纳入了140例临床疑似急性阑尾炎的患儿(45例阑尾炎确诊,95例阑尾炎排除)。对所有受试者进行了低剂量CT检查,并回顾性计算PAS。最初对38例受试者进行了超声检查。所有结果均与手术、组织病理学分析及随访得出的最终诊断结果进行比较。
低剂量CT的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为97.8%、100%和99.3%。当截断值≥5时,PAS的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为95%、84%和89%。腹部超声检查的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为55.6%、85%和71%。采用波特曼模型可提高超声检查的准确度(92%)。低剂量CT和PAS之间以及波特曼模型和超声检查之间的准确度存在显著差异。建议采用一种诊断方案,即先以PAS作为排除工具(PAS≤2可回家,≥7直接送去手术),然后进行超声检查,对于诊断不明确的病例则采用低剂量CT。该方案可使至少33.7%的患儿无需使用CT,在7例最初接受超声检查的患儿中也可避免使用CT。
虽然CT仍然是诊断儿童阑尾炎最准确且受操作者依赖性较小的诊断工具,但通过将PAS作为排除工具,超声作为主要成像方式,仅对诊断不明确的病例使用低剂量CT,可将辐射危害降至最低。