Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(11):3271-3278. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6015-z. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has instituted treatment guidelines for stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas (ETSTS). This study examined adherence to the NCCN guidelines and factors associated with nonadherent treatment and survival outcomes.
Patients with stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 ETSTS (n = 15,957) were categorized as undergoing adherent or nonadherent treatment based on the 2014 NCCN guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with nonadherent treatment. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated, and Cox models were used to generate adjusted survival curves and hazard ratios (HRs).
The findings showed that 87.2% of the patients with stage 2A disease and 58.3% of the patients with stage 2B or 3 disease received adherent treatment. Community treatment facilities and uninsured or unknown insurance status were associated with nonadherent treatment for both stage groups. Adherent treatment was associated with higher 5-year adjusted OS and DSS for stage 2A and stage 2B or 3 patients. In Cox models, nonadherent treatment was associated with worse survival for both stage 2A disease (HR, 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-2.63) and stages 2B and 3 disease (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.53-1.73). Increasing age and non-private insurance were associated with poorer outcomes. For stages 2B and 3 disease, treatment at a community center and African American race were associated with worse survival.
Adherence to NCCN guidelines is excellent for stage 2A and poor for stages 2B and 3 ETSTS. Adherent treatment was associated with improved survival outcomes, highlighting the importance of adherence to NCCN guidelines.
美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)已经为 2A 期和 2B 期及 3 期肢体和浅表躯干软组织肉瘤(ETSTS)制定了治疗指南。本研究检查了对 NCCN 指南的依从性以及与非依从性治疗和生存结果相关的因素。
根据 2014 年 NCCN 指南,将 15957 例 2A 期和 2B 期及 3 期 ETSTS 患者分为接受依从性或非依从性治疗的患者。使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定与非依从性治疗相关的因素。计算总生存率(OS)和疾病特异性生存率(DSS),并使用 Cox 模型生成调整后的生存曲线和风险比(HR)。
结果显示,87.2%的 2A 期疾病患者和 58.3%的 2B 期或 3 期疾病患者接受了依从性治疗。社区治疗设施和未投保或未知保险状况与两个分期组的非依从性治疗相关。对于 2A 期和 2B 期或 3 期患者,依从性治疗与较高的 5 年调整 OS 和 DSS 相关。在 Cox 模型中,非依从性治疗与 2A 期疾病(HR,2.31;95%置信区间 [CI],2.02-2.63)和 2B 期和 3 期疾病(HR,1.63;95% CI,1.53-1.73)的生存较差相关。年龄增长和非私人保险与较差的结果相关。对于 2B 期和 3 期疾病,在社区中心治疗和非裔美国人种族与较差的生存相关。
对 2A 期疾病的 NCCN 指南的依从性很好,但对 2B 期和 3 期 ETSTS 的依从性很差。依从性治疗与生存结果改善相关,突出了遵守 NCCN 指南的重要性。