Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cancer Med. 2019 Oct;8(14):6295-6304. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2441. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
Numerous studies across a variety of malignancies have demonstrated that health insurance status is associated with differences in clinical presentation, type of treatments received, and survival. The effect of insurance status on the management of soft tissue sarcoma is unknown. We assessed the association of insurance on (a) stage at diagnosis, (b) receipt of neoadjuvant/adjuvant radiation therapy, and (c) overall survival (OS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.
The study cohort was identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and consisted of patients with stage I-IV soft tissue sarcoma of various histologies diagnosed from 2004 to 2015. The patients were stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years) and by insurance status (commercial, Medicare, Medicaid and uninsured). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the association between insurance status and (a) stage at diagnosis (Stage I-III vs IV), and (b) receipt of neoadjuvant/adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced disease. The association of insurance status on OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. A propensity score matched survival analysis was performed to account for measured confounders.
49 754 patients were identified of whom 23 677 (48%) had commercial insurance, 20 867 (42%) had Medicare, 3229 (6%) had Medicaid, and 1981 (4%) were uninsured. In patients <65 years, those with Medicaid (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.57-1.93, P < .001) and the uninsured (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.51-1.94, P < .001) were more likely to present with stage IV vs Stage I-III disease. Furthermore, among patients with locally advanced disease treated with limb sparing surgery, those with Medicaid (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77- 0.98, P = .021) and the uninsured (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.85, P < .001) were less likely to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy as compared to those with commercial insurance. Lastly, having Medicaid (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17-1.34, P < .001) and no insurance (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.20-1.41, P < .001) was associated with worse OS compared to having commercial insurance, a finding which remained significant after propensity score matching. In contrast, in patients ≥65 years, there were no statistically significant differences between those with Medicare and commercial insurance with regards to disease presentation, receipt of radiotherapy, or survival.
In a large modern cohort identified from the NCDB, commercial insurance status in patients <65 years was associated early diagnosis, receipt of neoadjuvant/adjuvant radiation therapy, and overall survival for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Further efforts are warranted to understand disparities in care based on health insurance in the United States.
多项研究表明,在各种恶性肿瘤中,健康保险状况与临床表现、治疗类型和生存情况的差异有关。保险状况对软组织肉瘤管理的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了保险对(a)诊断时的分期、(b)接受新辅助/辅助放疗以及(c)软组织肉瘤患者总生存(OS)的影响。
从国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中确定了研究队列,该队列包括 2004 年至 2015 年间诊断为 I-IV 期不同组织学类型的软组织肉瘤患者。患者按年龄(<65 岁和≥65 岁)和保险状况(商业、医疗保险、医疗补助和无保险)分层。使用多变量逻辑回归分析,我们评估了保险状况与(a)诊断时的分期(I-III 期与 IV 期)以及(b)局部晚期疾病患者接受新辅助/辅助放疗之间的关系。使用 Kaplan-Meier 和多变量 Cox 比例风险分析评估了保险状况对 OS 的影响。进行倾向评分匹配生存分析以考虑测量的混杂因素。
共确定了 49754 名患者,其中 23677 名(48%)有商业保险,20867 名(42%)有医疗保险,3229 名(6%)有医疗补助,1981 名(4%)没有保险。在<65 岁的患者中,有医疗补助(OR=1.74,95%CI:1.57-1.93,P<0.001)和无保险(OR=1.71,95%CI:1.51-1.94,P<0.001)的患者更有可能出现 IV 期而不是 I-III 期疾病。此外,在接受保肢手术治疗的局部晚期疾病患者中,有医疗补助(OR=0.87,95%CI:0.77-0.98,P=0.021)和无保险(OR=0.73,95%CI:0.63-0.85,P<0.001)的患者接受新辅助或辅助放疗的可能性较小。最后,有医疗补助(HR=1.26,95%CI:1.17-1.34,P<0.001)和无保险(HR=1.30,95%CI:1.20-1.41,P<0.001)与商业保险相比,OS 较差,这一发现在倾向评分匹配后仍然显著。相比之下,在≥65 岁的患者中,医疗保险和商业保险之间在疾病表现、放疗接受情况或生存方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
在从 NCDB 中确定的一个大型现代队列中,<65 岁的患者的商业保险状况与软组织肉瘤患者的早期诊断、接受新辅助/辅助放疗以及总体生存相关。需要进一步努力了解美国医疗保险相关的护理差异。