Schwartz Franklin W, Liu Ganming, Aggarwal Pradeep, Schwartz Cynthia M
School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210.
Isotope Hydrology Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, A1400, Austria.
Ground Water. 2017 Sep;55(5):703-711. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12570. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
Concepts of simplicity and complexity in modeling have been explored in papers, editorials, and talks. The concept is not well understood because there are at least two flavors of simplicity. Modelers envision simplicity (i.e., elegant simplicity) as the sought-after goal in modeling, but naïve simplicity, which is the focus of this paper, is commonly unrecognized and dangerous. The problem is that naïve or simple ideas are often mistaken for settled science and come with the prospect of being more wrong than right. The concept of the so-called simplicity cycle, in relation to classical problems of carbon-14 age and salinity in closed-basin lakes, is used to illustrate these points. The emerging problems of water-mosquitoes-diseases show the value of mapping new problems to the simplicity cycle. Researchers can "know what they do not know" and avoid the dangers of naïve simplicity.
关于建模中简单性和复杂性的概念已在论文、社论和演讲中得到探讨。这个概念并未得到很好的理解,因为简单性至少有两种形式。建模者将简单性(即优雅的简单性)视为建模中追求的目标,但本文所关注的天真的简单性却常常未被认识到且具有危险性。问题在于,天真或简单的想法往往被误认为是既定的科学,而且出错的可能性大于正确的可能性。与封闭流域湖泊中碳 - 14年代和盐度的经典问题相关的所谓简单性循环概念,被用来阐述这些观点。水 - 蚊子 - 疾病这一新兴问题展示了将新问题映射到简单性循环的价值。研究人员可以“知道自己不知道什么”,并避免天真的简单性带来的危险。