Upadhyay Shailendra, Walsh Edward P, Cecchin Frank, Triedman John K, Villafane Juan, Saul J Philip
Department of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford, CT, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):1017-1026. doi: 10.1111/pace.13152. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
Experience with percutaneous epicardial ablation of tachyarrhythmia in pediatrics is limited. This case series addresses the feasibility, safety, and complications of the procedure in children.
A total of nine patients underwent 10 epicardial ablation procedures from 2002 to 2013 at two academic centers. Activation mapping was performed in all cases, and electroanatomic map was utilized in nine of the 10 procedures. Patients had undergone one to three failed endocardial catheter ablations in addition to medical management, and all had symptoms, a high-risk accessory pathway (AP), aborted cardiac arrest with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW), or ventricular dysfunction. A standard epicardial approach was used for access in all cases, using a 7- or 8- Fr sheath. Epicardial ablation modality was radiofrequency (RF) in seven, cryoablation (CRYO) in one, and CRYO plus RF in one.
Median age was 14 (range 8-19) years.
drug refractory ectopic atrial tachycardia (one), ventricular tachycardia (VT) (five), high-risk AP (two), and aborted cardiac arrest from WPW - (one). Epicardial ablation was not performed in one case despite access due to an inability to maneuver the catheter around a former pericardial scar. VT foci included the right ventricular outflow tract septum, high posterior left ventricle (LV), LV outflow tract, postero-basal LV, and scar from previous rhabdomyoma surgery. WPW foci were in the area of the posterior septum and coronary sinus in all three cases. Overall procedural success was 70% (7/10), with epicardial ablation success in five and endocardial ablation success after epicardial mapping in two. The VT focus was close to the left anterior descending coronary artery in one of the unsuccessful cases in which both RF and CRYO were used. There was one recurrence after a successful epicardial VT ablation, which was managed with a second successful epicardial procedure. There were no other recurrences at more than 1 year of follow-up. Complications were minimal, with one case of inadvertent pleural access requiring no specific therapy. No pericarditis or effusion was seen in any of the patients who underwent epicardial ablation.
Epicardial ablation in pediatric patients can be performed with low complications and acceptable success. It can be considered for a spectrum of tachycardia mechanisms after failed endocardial ablation attempts and suspected epicardial foci. Success and recurrence may be related to foci in proximity to the epicardial coronaries, pericardial scar, or a distant location from the closest epicardial location. Repeat procedures may be necessary.
儿科经皮心外膜消融治疗快速性心律失常的经验有限。本病例系列探讨了该手术在儿童中的可行性、安全性及并发症。
2002年至2013年期间,共有9例患者在两个学术中心接受了10次心外膜消融手术。所有病例均进行了激动标测,10例手术中有9例使用了电解剖标测。患者除药物治疗外,还经历了1至3次心内膜导管消融失败,且均有症状、高危旁路(AP)、 Wolff-Parkinson-White综合征(WPW)伴心脏骤停未遂或心室功能障碍。所有病例均采用标准的心外膜入路,使用7或8 Fr鞘管。心外膜消融方式为射频(RF)消融7例,冷冻消融(CRYO)1例,CRYO联合RF消融1例。
中位年龄为14岁(范围8 - 19岁)。
药物难治性异位房性心动过速(1例)、室性心动过速(VT)(5例)、高危AP(2例)、WPW所致心脏骤停未遂(1例)。1例尽管成功建立入路,但因无法将导管绕过既往心包瘢痕而未进行心外膜消融。VT起源部位包括右心室流出道间隔、左心室后高位、左心室流出道、左心室后基底段以及既往横纹肌瘤手术瘢痕处。3例WPW起源部位均位于后间隔和冠状窦区域。总体手术成功率为70%(7/10),其中心外膜消融成功5例,心外膜标测后心内膜消融成功2例。在1例同时使用RF和CRYO的失败病例中,VT起源部位靠近左前降支冠状动脉。1例心外膜VT消融成功后复发,再次行心外膜手术成功处理。随访1年以上无其他复发情况。并发症极少,1例意外进入胸膜腔,无需特殊治疗。接受心外膜消融的患者均未出现心包炎或心包积液。
儿科患者的心外膜消融手术并发症少,成功率尚可。在心内膜消融尝试失败且怀疑心外膜起源时,可考虑用于一系列心动过速机制。手术成功及复发可能与靠近心外膜冠状动脉、心包瘢痕或距最近心外膜位置较远的起源部位有关。可能需要重复手术。