Gaydukova I Z, Gamayunova К A, Dorogoykina K D, Rebrov A P
V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saratov, Russia.
Ter Arkh. 2017;89(6):78-83. doi: 10.17116/terarkh201789678-83.
To compare the efficiency and safety of two celecoxib regimens in the short-term treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
Examinations were made in 40 patients with axSpA (the 2009 ASAS criteria; age, 38.5±12.1 years; 29 (72.5%) men; axSpA duration, 6.67±5.8 years; BASDAI ≥4.0), who were randomly divided into two groups: 1) 20 patients who received celecoxib 400 mg/day for 30 days; 2) 20 patients who took celecoxib 600 mg/day for 7 days, then the drug was continued at a dose of 200 mg/day for 1 month. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined; back pain was assessed using a visual analog scale; ASDAS-CRP scores were calculated at baseline (day 0) and on days 8 and 30.
On days 0, 8, and 30 of taking celecoxib 400 mg, the back pain scores were 6.0±3.01, 5.06±2.04, and 5.53±2.35; CRP levels, 24.13±21.46; 27.3±29.3%, and 13.1±21.3 mg/l; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 15.25±14.36, 11.85±13.6, and 9.5±6.34 mm/h, respectively (p≥0.05 for all differences in all indicators relative to the baseline values). ASDAS was 3.34±1.02 at baseline, 2.74±1.14 on day 8, and 2.18±1.05 on day 30 (p=0.016 and p=0,000 for differences from the baseline values). In the patients using the dose de-escalation of celecoxib, the back pain scores were 4.95±1.6, 4.11±1.0, and 4.89±2.1 at baseline and on days 8 and 30, respectively (p=0.38 and p=0.065 for the differences from the baseline values); the CRP levels were 15.3±12.5, 12.1±10.8, and 7.5±4.5 mg/l, respectively (p=0.3 and p=0.001); ESR, 13.35±7.2, 15.7±11.6, and 15.16±8.9 mm/h (p≥0.05). At baseline and on days 8 and 30, ASDAS was 3.1±0.6, 2.22±0.7, and 3.47±0.56, respectively (p=0.02 and p=0.000). No differences were found in the rate of adverse events.
Different regimens using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs demonstrated their feasibility, efficiency, and safety in AxSpA patients with high disease activity. The continuous use of celecoxib showed a gradual decrease in clinical and laboratory activity. The de-escalation dose of celecoxib achieved a permanent laboratory activity reduction and pain relief when using 600 mg celecoxib, and after reducing its dose to 200 mg/day, there was a decrease in laboratory disease activity without substantially changing the patients' functional activity. The safety of the comparable regimens was comparable.
比较两种塞来昔布治疗方案在短期治疗中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者的有效性和安全性。
对40例axSpA患者(符合2009年ASAS标准;年龄38.5±12.1岁;男性29例(72.5%);axSpA病程6.67±5.8年;BASDAI≥4.0)进行检查,将其随机分为两组:1)20例患者接受塞来昔布400mg/天,共30天;2)20例患者先服用塞来昔布600mg/天,共7天,然后以200mg/天的剂量持续服用1个月。测定高敏C反应蛋白(CRP);使用视觉模拟量表评估背痛;在基线(第0天)、第8天和第30天计算ASDAS-CRP评分。
服用塞来昔布400mg的第0天、第8天和第30天,背痛评分分别为6.0±3.01、5.06±2.04和5.53±2.35;CRP水平分别为24.13±21.46、27.3±29.3%和13.1±21.3mg/l;红细胞沉降率(ESR)分别为15.25±14.36、11.85±13.6和9.5±6.34mm/h(所有指标相对于基线值的差异p≥0.05)。基线时ASDAS为3.34±1.02,第8天为2.74±1.14,第30天为2.18±1.05(与基线值相比差异p=0.016和p=0.000)。在使用塞来昔布剂量递减方案的患者中,基线时、第8天和第30天的背痛评分分别为4.95±1.6、4.11±1.0和4.89±2.1(与基线值相比差异p=0.38和p=0.065);CRP水平分别为15.3±12.5、12.1±10.8和7.5±4.5mg/l(p=0.3和p=0.001);ESR分别为13.35±7.2、15.7±11.6和15.16±8.9mm/h(p≥0.05)。基线时、第8天和第30天,ASDAS分别为3.1±0.6、2.22±0.7和3.47±0.56(p=0.02和p=0.000)。不良事件发生率无差异。
不同的非甾体抗炎药治疗方案在疾病活动度高的axSpA患者中显示出可行性、有效性和安全性。持续使用塞来昔布显示临床和实验室活动逐渐降低。塞来昔布剂量递减方案在使用600mg塞来昔布时实现了实验室活动的持续降低和疼痛缓解,将剂量降至200mg/天后,实验室疾病活动度降低,而患者功能活动无明显变化。两种可比方案的安全性相当。