Schmid M, Guillaume F
Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Oct;119(4):214-225. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2017.36. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Several evolutionary processes shape the genetic and phenotypic differentiation of populations. Among them, the joint effects of gene flow, selection and phenotypic plasticity are poorly known, especially when trying to understand how maladaptive plasticity affects population divergence. We extended a quantitative genetic model of Hendry et al. (2001) to describe these joint effects on phenotypic and additive genetic divergence between two populations, and their phenotypic and genetic differentiation (P and Q). With individual-based simulations, we tested our model predictions and further modeled allelic differentiation at neutral (F) and adaptive (F) loci. While adaptive phenotypic plasticity allows for large phenotypic divergence and differentiation despite high gene flow, maladaptive plasticity promotes genetic divergence and generates countergradient variation, under extensive migration with phenotypic differences sometimes opposed to genetic differences. Maladaptive plasticity can also promote adaptive phenotypic divergence by reducing the effective gene flow. Overall, plasticity decouples genetic from phenotypic differences between populations, and blurs the correlation between phenotypic divergence and local adaptation. By deriving models of population differentiation for three different life cycles, we further describe the effect of a species' ecology on evolution in structured populations.
若干进化过程塑造了种群的遗传和表型分化。其中,基因流、选择和表型可塑性的联合效应鲜为人知,尤其是在试图理解适应不良的可塑性如何影响种群分化时。我们扩展了亨德里等人(2001年)的定量遗传模型,以描述这些对两个种群之间表型和加性遗传分化以及它们的表型和遗传差异(P和Q)的联合效应。通过基于个体的模拟,我们检验了模型预测,并进一步模拟了中性(F)和适应性(F)位点的等位基因分化。虽然适应性表型可塑性允许在高基因流的情况下出现较大的表型差异和分化,但在广泛迁移且表型差异有时与遗传差异相反的情况下,适应不良的可塑性会促进遗传分化并产生反梯度变异。适应不良的可塑性还可以通过减少有效基因流来促进适应性表型分化。总体而言,可塑性使种群之间的遗传差异与表型差异脱钩,并模糊了表型分化与局部适应之间以及遗传分化与局部适应之间的相关性。通过推导三种不同生命周期的种群分化模型,我们进一步描述了物种生态对结构化种群进化的影响。